home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,576 of 20,898   
   Steven L. to All   
   Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain thi   
   28 Oct 11 15:06:31   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: sdlitvin@earthlink.net   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?   
      
      
      
   "Wouter Valentijn"  wrote in message    
   news:4ea9be6b$0$6841$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl:   
      
   > "Steven L."  schreef in bericht   
   > news:G_CdnVey4NAFOzTTnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@earthlink.com...   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > "Bast"  wrote in message   
   > > news:j8c731$guf$1@dont-email.me:   
   > >   
   > >> Steven L. wrote:   
   > >> > "Frosty"  wrote in message   
   > >> > news:j8a4tk$kpu$1@dont-email.me:   
   > >> >   
   > >> >>> Where did this "repeat offender" movie backstory even come from ?   
   > >> >>>   
   > >> >>> TOS only mentioned that Kirk had found a way to modify a test that no   
   > >> >>> one else ever thought of.   
   > >> >>> Ingenuity,...is not something usually thought of as Bad Boy Anarchist   
   > >> >>> behaviour.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Romulans go back in time, attack the Kelvin, Kirk's dad dies. Which is   
   > >> >> slightly different from Kirk's dad seeing him become Captain of the   
   > >> >> Enterprise.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Also because of that, Kirk never has a biological brother Sam like he   
   > >> > did in the TOS universe.  He grew up an only child with a stepfather   
   > >> > with whom he evidently did not get along.   
   > >> >   
   > >> >   
   > >> >   
   > >> >   
   > >> > -- Steven L.   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> Which still says,...That Movie has nothing to do with REAL STAR TREK   
   > >   
   > > It's a reboot, just like the 2000s Battlestar Galactica was a reboot of   
   > > the 1970s series.  That meant that the basic concept was the same, but the   
   > > details are all different, updated to reflect a different time with a   
   > > different audience.   
   > >   
   > > The new Battlestar Galactica downplayed or even dropped the "Chariots of   
   > > the Gods" mythology of the 1970s series, and replaced it with an allegory   
   > > of the War on Terror.   
   >   
   > In my opinion they did even more so!   
   > In the 1970's show and in G80 they arrived in the 'now'.   
   > In the Reboot they did arive in our prehistory. Exactly 'Chariots of the   
   > Gods'.   
      
   I said:  The details are all different.  The basic concept is the same.   
      
   In Abrams' Star Trek, Kirk finally gets the captaincy, Spock ends up    
   second in command, and Pike ends up in a wheelchair.  Just like in TOS.     
   But how they got there is totally different.   
      
   This, btw, is a favorite theme of Abrams and his favorite writer    
   Lindelof:  The universe course-correcting itself.  Details may change    
   but it converges to the same end result.   
      
      
      
   -- Steven L.   
      
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca