From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?   
      
   On Nov 18, 10:03apm, Akira Norimaki  wrote:   
   > > I liked "Blindness", "Code 46", "Cube", "Cypher"...   
   > I've never seen "Blindness"   
   Blindess is a film about people suddenly going blind and the first   
   people getting surviving in quarantine.   
   It's not action SF by any means... an interesting drama, though.   
   > and "Cypher", so wish-listed.   
   Spy thriller with some action and cheap FX by the guy who did Cube.   
   > I had a really   
   > hard time watching "Code 46", they whisper a lot and that's a pain with   
   > a language is not your own, thus I may be biased, I didn't like it.   
   Fair enough.   
   > I did like "Cube".   
   I didn't like Cube 2.   
   I linked the first half hour or so of "The Island"... then it went to   
   shit.   
   > >> but I disagree on First Contact. Unless you are saying   
   > >> that FC was a ST:TOS movie, in that case I sort of agree. The   
   > >> kirkization of Picard in FC was complete(d).   
   > > OK, yeah, Picard as action hero wasn't very TNG... but big borg   
   > > episode was... they even had to reset the Borg to do it.   
   > True. Although those Borgs were more Voyager's that TNG's.   
   Good point.   
   Still don't think the "Think 4 dimensionally line makes sense."   
   ===   
   = DUG.   
   ===   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    # Origin: http://groups.google.com (1:2320/105.97)   
    * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)