home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,539 of 20,898   
   Akira Norimaki to All   
   Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain thi   
   17 Nov 11 08:07:12   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: diotonante@gmail.com   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?   
      
   Duggy wrote:   
   > [Star Trek XI]   
   >>>>>> Agreed, on both. It's a funny ride but the plot is rather pointless.   
   >>>>> So it's an action film.   
   >>>> Yeah, pretty much. An action movie in space.   
   >>> It sells.   
   >    
   >> I can understand why. It would have been nice to have something more for   
   >> this franchise but that's what we have now.   
   >    
   > Thing is franchises have to be blockbusters these days.   
   >    
   > You want a quality thoughtful film you're going to need to do a random   
   > no-budget film with no franchise attached.   
   >    
   > Moon, for example.   
      
   Or, "The Man from Earth"... and, well, I don't recall anything else   
   recent at the moment. LOL. I'm sure there are others though, there must be.   
      
   >> I started to enjoy the movie only after I   
   >> realized it is not Star Trek. Not ST as I think it should be, I mean.   
   >> And to be totally honest with myself I don't see any the ST movies that   
   >> is exactly as I think ST should be, expect Khaaaaaaannnnnn and, maybe,   
   >> [slow] Motion Picture.   
   >    
   > ST was clearly a TOS episode made too long (yes, I know it was the 2-   
   > part pilot for Star Trek: "Phase 2" based on an unused "Genesis II"   
   > idea) so yeah, it was Trek.  2... yeah, a bit too much action, but   
   > very STTOS plot.  5... was a very Star Trek plot... but that doesn't   
   > mean it was good.  I think 6 was as well...   
   >    
   > The first 3 Next Gen films were (in varying ways) very TNG.  Nemesis   
   > was a whole lot of different films... including Bond... thrown   
   > together.   
      
   Maybe Generation, but I disagree on First Contact. Unless you are saying   
   that FC was a ST:TOS movie, in that case I sort of agree. The   
   kirkization of Picard in FC was complete(d).   
      
   Insurrection and Nemesis don't exist. I had them removed from my memory.   
   They are god awful things of evil. :P   
      
   I still have nightmares of the inflatable Data and of the Enterprise   
   driven with a joystick...  and that is disconcerting because having them   
   removed from my memory I don't know where those idiotic ideas come from.   
   LOL.   
      
   --    
   I'll be seeing you,   
      
   - "We don't need no education..."   
   - Yes, you do. You've just used a double negative!   
      
   http://craphound.com/walh/audiobook/download-audiobook   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    # Origin: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 (1:2320/105.97)   
    * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca