Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,539 of 20,898    |
|    Akira Norimaki to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain thi    |
|    17 Nov 11 08:07:12    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: diotonante@gmail.com       Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?              Duggy wrote:       > [Star Trek XI]       >>>>>> Agreed, on both. It's a funny ride but the plot is rather pointless.       >>>>> So it's an action film.       >>>> Yeah, pretty much. An action movie in space.       >>> It sells.       >        >> I can understand why. It would have been nice to have something more for       >> this franchise but that's what we have now.       >        > Thing is franchises have to be blockbusters these days.       >        > You want a quality thoughtful film you're going to need to do a random       > no-budget film with no franchise attached.       >        > Moon, for example.              Or, "The Man from Earth"... and, well, I don't recall anything else       recent at the moment. LOL. I'm sure there are others though, there must be.              >> I started to enjoy the movie only after I       >> realized it is not Star Trek. Not ST as I think it should be, I mean.       >> And to be totally honest with myself I don't see any the ST movies that       >> is exactly as I think ST should be, expect Khaaaaaaannnnnn and, maybe,       >> [slow] Motion Picture.       >        > ST was clearly a TOS episode made too long (yes, I know it was the 2-       > part pilot for Star Trek: "Phase 2" based on an unused "Genesis II"       > idea) so yeah, it was Trek. 2... yeah, a bit too much action, but       > very STTOS plot. 5... was a very Star Trek plot... but that doesn't       > mean it was good. I think 6 was as well...       >        > The first 3 Next Gen films were (in varying ways) very TNG. Nemesis       > was a whole lot of different films... including Bond... thrown       > together.              Maybe Generation, but I disagree on First Contact. Unless you are saying       that FC was a ST:TOS movie, in that case I sort of agree. The       kirkization of Picard in FC was complete(d).              Insurrection and Nemesis don't exist. I had them removed from my memory.       They are god awful things of evil. :P              I still have nightmares of the inflatable Data and of the Enterprise       driven with a joystick... and that is disconcerting because having them       removed from my memory I don't know where those idiotic ideas come from.       LOL.              --        I'll be seeing you,              - "We don't need no education..."       - Yes, you do. You've just used a double negative!              http://craphound.com/walh/audiobook/download-audiobook       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp        # Origin: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 (1:2320/105.97)        * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca