From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: sdlitvin@earthlink.net   
   Subject: Re: The Practical Joker (TAS): my review   
      
      
      
   "Graeme"  wrote in message    
   news:531cfacd-5008-4d7a-a269-7861209f178a@y7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Nov 14, 1:04apm, "Steven L."  wrote:   
   > > "Graeme"  wrote in message   
   > >   
   > > news:ade718eb-d20f-451e-ac85-ecde64c1659e@k5g2000pre.googlegroups.com:   
   > >   
   > > > This one is my #4 episode, after Slaver Weapon, Yesteryear, and   
   > > > Pirates of Orion. aI still don't buy the idea of a computer   
   > > > accidentally becoming sentient, but even Asimov wrote stories around   
   > > > that premise, so we can let it pass.   
   > >   
   > > Computers that unexpectedly become sentient is a staple of science   
   > > fiction for at least 50 years. aLots and lots of short stories, movies,   
   > > and novels. aAlso a couple of TV episodes of "The Twilight Zone."   
   > >   
   > > An example is "When Harlie Was One," written by David Gerrold in 1972.   
   > > It dealt with a robot programmed with artificial intelligence to the   
   > > point that it could act like a person. aAnd when it became necessary to   
   > > switch it off, the question arose whether it *was* a person, so that   
   > > switching it off would constitute murder.   
   > >   
   > > And yep, that theme appeared later in a TNG episode involving Data--"The   
   > > Measure of a Man," I think it was.   
   > >   
   > > -- Steven L.   
   >   
   > It's kind of a dumb story, across the board, though.  In The   
   > Bicentennial Man, I think the android was sentient through a   
   > manufacturing defect or something.  In Star Trek:  The Motion Picture,   
   > V'ger is said to have achieved consciousness because it acquired "so   
   > much knowledge".  A hard drive doesn't become conscious when you store   
   > enough files on it.  Consciousness is just a lot more complex than the   
   > writers think it is.   
   >   
   > As for turning off a sentient computer, even if one existed, that   
   > could hardly be murder so long as you can switch it back on at any   
   > time.   
      
   Depends.   
   When I reboot my computer, everything that was in its RAM memory is    
   gone.   
      
   If you want to claim that completely erasing a sentient being's brain    
   isn't murder, I would disagree with you because that being's knowledge    
   base made it the person he is.   
      
      
   -- Steven L.   
      
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)