From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: YourName@YourISP.com   
   Subject: Re: Kirk and Spock in the news, again (link)   
      
   In article <539af9f9$0$2964$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, Wouter   
   Valentijn  wrote:   
   > Your Name schreef op 13-6-2014 08:12:   
   > > In article , ToolPackinMama   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> http://www.cnet.com/news/americans-think-star-trek-is-the-f   
   ture-not-star-w   
   > >> ars-study-says/   
   > >   
   > > Well, DUH!   
   > > Star Wars is set "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away".   
   > > Star Trek is set in Earth's near-ish future.   
   > >   
   >    
   > ROFL   
   >    
   > I'd take Star Trek over Star Wars any day.   
   >    
   > Not that I'm totally anti Star Wars. I liked Star Wars (IV) and TESB    
   > very much. ROTJ was a lesser movie and the prequels... Never mind them.   
      
   The only real issue with Star Wars is that there was such a long time   
   between the trilogies, meaning they look quite different due to   
   technology improvements, differeing style, over-the-top fight scenes,   
   etc. Many of the later additions to the Original Trilogy look out of   
   place with the older film quality / style. If all six (and soon a   
   ridiculously tacked-on third Trilogy) had been made continuously like   
   "Harry Potter", for example, then those differences would have been   
   much less noticeable.   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)