From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au   
   Subject: Re: [OT] Awesome and funny Tesla car review (link)   
      
   On 19/05/14 07:11, Your Name wrote:   
   > In article , Daniel   
   > wrote:   
   >> On 18/05/14 11:23, Your Name wrote:   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>> anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>> In article <180520141014073156%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   >>>> Your Name wrote:   
   >>>>> In article , Jan Alter   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Delightful.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No more oil changes.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't know about that review link, but electric cars still use oil to   
   >>>>> lubricate the various moving parts (wheel bearings, etc.) as well as in   
   >>>>> the production of much of the world's electricity.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Most of it's sealed, but you've got battery pack coolant, brake fluid,   
   >>>> gearbox oil, windshield wiper fluid, whatever it uses for 'freon' ...   
   >>>> you have to have $600 a year in service from Tesla where presumably   
   >>>> they'll do all that; of course, there's not a Tesla dealer within the   
   >>>> car's driving range of me, so that would be a problem.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Anyone who believes electric cars are a panacea to the "oil crisis" or   
   >>>>> the "green revolution" is simply a blinkered moron.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yeah, they've bought into 'tailpipe emissions' and don't realize that as   
   >>>> much or more pollution is being generated, just upstream.   
   >>>   
   >>> Also "downstream" in trying to get rid of all those extra toxic   
   >>> batteries. Plus, since the pile of batteries inside them will   
   >>> expensively need to be replaced fairly often, most people will simply   
   >>> upgrade to a newer car (one of the real reasons behind the push), which   
   >>> means then also means extra material to be disposed of.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Here in New Zealand, they've just started new electric trains in   
   >>> Auckland City (some parts, since not all the lines are electrified yet)   
   >>> and are boasting about how great they are ... except they have to keep   
   >>> the old diesel trains around beacuse when the electricty goes down the   
   >>> only way to then move the stupid new trains is by towing them with a   
   >>> real train, plus only some parts of the system have been electrified.   
   >>> :-\   
   >>   
   >> Christchurch NZ city centre was almost wiped out in an earthquake a few   
   >> years ago. Does Aucknd suffer from earthquakes much??   
   >   
   > Nope, not really anything in Auckland. (Christchurch is still having   
   > small quakes every so often, and Wellington further north as had a few   
   > recently.)   
   >   
   > There have been minor shakes in the past (mostly peripheral from   
   > earthquakes further south where the fault line actually crosses the   
   > land), but nothing really noticeable.   
   >   
   > Auckland does have lots of volcanic cones, but they're all dead /   
   > dormant, although they keep wittering on about how an eruption is "due"   
   > in the next thousand years or so.   
   >   
   > Being on a narrow strip of land between two oceans near the top of the   
   > north, it could be get a tsunami wave, but the recent one of those was   
   > lucky if it was an inch by the time it got way down here across   
   > thousands of miles of ocean.   
   >   
   > Recent years has seen a few small tornadoes pass through, a couple of   
   > which have been pretty bad (two or three people killed), but nothing   
   > compared to those massive twisters in some parts of America.   
   >   
   Sounds like your life could be becoming more and more interesting!1 ;-)   
      
   Here, on the other side of the ditch, we;re doing reasonably alright!!   
      
   Daniel   
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: TeraNews.com (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   
|