From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: epwise@yahoo.com   
   Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth   
      
   "Adam H. Kerman"  wrote in   
   news:li5663$pg0$1@news.albasani.net:    
      
   > David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>On 4/9/2014 6:20 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>David Johnston   wrote:   
   >>>>On 4/9/2014 5:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Joe Pfeiffer  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>"Adam H. Kerman"  writes:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Let the furious backpedalling begin!   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>It is not backpedalling to deny holding a position that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>one never claimed to hold.   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>She knew she was working for Robert Sungenis and what his   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>reputation was.  So, yeah, "I don't stand behind the work I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>was just paid for" is backpedalling.   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>She's a compensated spokesman, literally. Wrong again,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Johnston.    
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>From shawn 's quote of her   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>statement:    
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribe to anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>science and history and, had I known of his involvement,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>would most certainly have avoided this documentary. I was a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>So she says she didn't know she was working for Sungenis.   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>>yeah, that seems unlikely.  I mean, it's *possible* but it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>would take a really concerted effort on Sungenis' part to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>hide his identity, and why?   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>>No, it wouldn't.  All it would require is for him to deal with   
   >>>>>>>>>>her on a corporate basis.  And there's no way she would have   
   >>>>>>>>>>known who the hell he was if his name happened to come up   
   >>>>>>>>>>anyway.    
   >    
   >>>>>>>>>I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,   
   >    
   >>>>>>>>But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling.  You   
   >>>>>>>>couldn't just immediately hear the name and know he was a   
   >>>>>>>>nutbar.    
   >    
   >>>>>>>Nice backpedal, Johnston.   
   >    
   >>>>>>From what?   
   >    
   >>>>>From the excuses you were making for her.   
   >    
   >>>>No I haven't backpedaled from them at all.  I still think she had no   
   >>>>idea who had hired her.   
   >    
   >>>That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston.   
   >    
   >>Sure it was the issue.  The original post was claiming Mulgrew was the   
   >>stupidest woman alive because she "endorsed" geocentrism.   
   >    
   > Nice backpedal, Johnston. We've been over this time and again. She's   
   > LITERALLY paid to endorse Robert Sungenis' ideas.   
      
   Yes, over and over.   
      
   How many times do you have to be told you're wrong?   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: TeraNews.com (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)