From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: epwise@yahoo.com   
   Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth   
      
   "Adam H. Kerman"  wrote in   
   news:li4o4g$2vk$2@news.albasani.net:    
      
   > David Johnston   wrote:   
   >>On 4/9/2014 5:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>> On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Joe Pfeiffer  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman"  writes:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let the furious backpedalling begin!   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It is not backpedalling to deny holding a position that one   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> never claimed to hold.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She knew she was working for Robert Sungenis and what his   
   >>>>>>>>>>> reputation was.  So, yeah, "I don't stand behind the work I   
   >>>>>>>>>>> was just paid for" is backpedalling.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> She's a compensated spokesman, literally. Wrong again,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Johnston.    
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>> >From shawn 's quote of her   
   >>>>>>>>> >statement:    
   >>>>>>>>>>> proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not   
   >>>>>>>>>>> subscribe to anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding   
   >>>>>>>>>>> science and    
   >>history and,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> had I known of his involvement, would most certainly have   
   >>>>>>>>>>> avoided this documentary. I was a voice for hire, and a   
   >>>>>>>>>>> misinformed one, at that. I    
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> So she says she didn't know she was working for Sungenis.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>> yeah, that seems unlikely.  I mean, it's *possible* but it   
   >>>>>>>>> would take a really concerted effort on Sungenis' part to hide   
   >>>>>>>>> his identity, and why?    
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>> No, it wouldn't.  All it would require is for him to deal with   
   >>>>>>>> her on a corporate basis.  And there's no way she would have   
   >>>>>>>> known who the hell he was if his name happened to come up   
   >>>>>>>> anyway.    
   >>>   
   >>>>>>> I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling.  You   
   >>>>>> couldn't just immediately hear the name and know he was a nutbar.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Nice backpedal, Johnston.   
   >>>   
   >>>>From what?   
   >>>   
   >>>  From the excuses you were making for her.   
   >>   
   >>No I haven't backpedaled from them at all.  I still think she had no    
   >>idea who had hired her.   
   >    
   > That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston. You're   
   > choosing to defend her claim because you're playing your usual games.   
   > I can repeat it another twelve times; perhaps the point will set in. I   
   > know you have the ability to make up meaningless excuses. You trying   
   > to hire out as a P.R. flack? Luck on your project.   
   >    
      
   And you're berating Mulgrew because you hated Voyager.  If it had been    
   William Shatner or Nichelle Nichols YOU'D be making excuses for them.    
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: TeraNews.com (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)