home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,757 of 20,898   
   Adam H. Kerman to All   
   Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves aroun   
   10 Apr 14 00:20:32   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: ahk@chinet.com   
   Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth   
      
   David Johnston   wrote:   
   >On 4/9/2014 5:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>> On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>> On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Joe Pfeiffer  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman"  writes:   
   >>>>>>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Let the furious backpedalling begin!   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It is not backpedalling to deny holding a position that one never   
   >>>>>>>>>>> claimed to hold.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>> She knew she was working for Robert Sungenis and what his   
   >>>>>>>>>> reputation was.  So, yeah, "I don't stand behind the work I was   
   >>>>>>>>>> just paid for" is backpedalling.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>> She's a compensated spokesman, literally. Wrong again, Johnston.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>> >From shawn 's quote of her statement:   
   >>>>>>>>>> proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not subscribe to   
   >>>>>>>>>> anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding science and   
   >history and,   
   >>>>>>>>>> had I known of his involvement, would most certainly have avoided   
   this   
   >>>>>>>>>> documentary. I was a voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at   
   that. I   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>> So she says she didn't know she was working for Sungenis.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>> yeah, that seems unlikely.  I mean, it's *possible* but it would take   
   a   
   >>>>>>>> really concerted effort on Sungenis' part to hide his identity, and   
   why?   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> No, it wouldn't.  All it would require is for him to deal with her on a   
   >>>>>>> corporate basis.  And there's no way she would have known who the hell   
   >>>>>>> he was if his name happened to come up anyway.   
   >>   
   >>>>>> I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,   
   >>   
   >>>>> But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling.  You couldn't just   
   >>>>> immediately hear the name and know he was a nutbar.   
   >>   
   >>>> Nice backpedal, Johnston.   
   >>   
   >>>From what?   
   >>   
   >>  From the excuses you were making for her.   
   >   
   >No I haven't backpedaled from them at all.  I still think she had no    
   >idea who had hired her.   
      
   That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston. You're choosing   
   to defend her claim because you're playing your usual games. I can repeat   
   it another twelve times; perhaps the point will set in. I know you have   
   the ability to make up meaningless excuses. You trying to hire out as a   
   P.R. flack? Luck on your project.   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: albasani.net (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca