home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,753 of 20,898   
   David Johnston to All   
   Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves aroun   
   09 Apr 14 17:09:02   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: David@block.net   
   Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth   
      
   On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   > David Johnston  wrote:   
   >> On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>> On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>>> Joe Pfeiffer  wrote:   
   >>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman"  writes:   
   >>>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>>>>> Let the furious backpedalling begin!   
   >   
   >>>>>>>> It is not backpedalling to deny holding a position that one never   
   >>>>>>>> claimed to hold.   
   >   
   >>>>>>> She knew she was working for Robert Sungenis and what his reputation   
   was.   
   >>>>>>> So, yeah, "I don't stand behind the work I was just paid for" is   
   >>>>>>> backpedalling.   
   >   
   >>>>>>> She's a compensated spokesman, literally. Wrong again, Johnston.   
   >   
   >>>>> >From shawn 's quote of her statement:   
   >>>>>>> proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not subscribe to   
   >>>>>>> anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding science and history and,   
   >>>>>>> had I known of his involvement, would most certainly have avoided this   
   >>>>>>> documentary. I was a voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I   
   >   
   >>>>>> So she says she didn't know she was working for Sungenis.   
   >   
   >>>>> yeah, that seems unlikely.  I mean, it's *possible* but it would take a   
   >>>>> really concerted effort on Sungenis' part to hide his identity, and why?   
   >   
   >>>> No, it wouldn't.  All it would require is for him to deal with her on a   
   >>>> corporate basis.  And there's no way she would have known who the hell   
   >>>> he was if his name happened to come up anyway.   
   >   
   >>> I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,   
   >   
   >> But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling.  You couldn't just   
   >> immediately hear the name and know he was a nutbar.   
   >   
   > Nice backpedal, Johnston.   
   >   
      
    From what?   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca