Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,603 of 20,898    |
|    Akira Norimaki to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain thi    |
|    18 Nov 11 13:03:34    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: diotonante@gmail.com       Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?              Duggy wrote:       >>> Thing is franchises have to be blockbusters these days.       >>> You want a quality thoughtful film you're going to need to do a random       >>> no-budget film with no franchise attached.       >>> Moon, for example.       >> Or, "The Man from Earth"... and, well, I don't recall anything else       >> recent at the moment. LOL. I'm sure there are others though, there must be.       >        > I liked "Blindness", "Code 46", "Cube", "Cypher"...              I've never seen "Blindness" and "Cypher", so wish-listed. I had a really       hard time watching "Code 46", they whisper a lot and that's a pain with       a language is not your own, thus I may be biased, I didn't like it. I       did like "Cube".              >>> ST was clearly a TOS episode made too long (yes, I know it was the 2-       >>> part pilot for Star Trek: "Phase 2" based on an unused "Genesis II"       >>> idea) so yeah, it was Trek. 2... yeah, a bit too much action, but       >>> very STTOS plot. 5... was a very Star Trek plot... but that doesn't       >>> mean it was good. I think 6 was as well...       >        >>> The first 3 Next Gen films were (in varying ways) very TNG. Nemesis       >>> was a whole lot of different films... including Bond... thrown       >>> together.       >        >> Maybe Generation,       >        > OK.       >        >> but I disagree on First Contact. Unless you are saying       >> that FC was a ST:TOS movie, in that case I sort of agree. The       >> kirkization of Picard in FC was complete(d).       >        > OK, yeah, Picard as action hero wasn't very TNG... but big borg       > episode was... they even had to reset the Borg to do it.              True. Although those Borgs were more Voyager's that TNG's.              --        I'll be seeing you,              - "We don't need no education..."       - Yes, you do. You've just used a double negative!              http://craphound.com/walh/audiobook/download-audiobook       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp        * Origin: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 (1:2320/105.97)       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca