home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,603 of 20,898   
   Akira Norimaki to All   
   Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain thi   
   18 Nov 11 13:03:34   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: diotonante@gmail.com   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?   
      
   Duggy wrote:   
   >>> Thing is franchises have to be blockbusters these days.   
   >>> You want a quality thoughtful film you're going to need to do a random   
   >>> no-budget film with no franchise attached.   
   >>> Moon, for example.   
   >> Or, "The Man from Earth"... and, well, I don't recall anything else   
   >> recent at the moment. LOL. I'm sure there are others though, there must be.   
   >    
   > I liked "Blindness", "Code 46", "Cube", "Cypher"...   
      
   I've never seen "Blindness" and "Cypher", so wish-listed. I had a really   
   hard time watching "Code 46", they whisper a lot and that's a pain with   
   a language is not your own, thus I may be biased, I didn't like it. I   
   did like "Cube".   
      
   >>> ST was clearly a TOS episode made too long (yes, I know it was the 2-   
   >>> part pilot for Star Trek: "Phase 2" based on an unused "Genesis II"   
   >>> idea) so yeah, it was Trek.  2... yeah, a bit too much action, but   
   >>> very STTOS plot.  5... was a very Star Trek plot... but that doesn't   
   >>> mean it was good.  I think 6 was as well...   
   >    
   >>> The first 3 Next Gen films were (in varying ways) very TNG.  Nemesis   
   >>> was a whole lot of different films... including Bond... thrown   
   >>> together.   
   >    
   >> Maybe Generation,   
   >    
   > OK.   
   >    
   >> but I disagree on First Contact. Unless you are saying   
   >> that FC was a ST:TOS movie, in that case I sort of agree. The   
   >> kirkization of Picard in FC was complete(d).   
   >    
   > OK, yeah, Picard as action hero wasn't very TNG... but big borg   
   > episode was... they even had to reset the Borg to do it.   
      
   True. Although those Borgs were more Voyager's that TNG's.   
      
   --    
   I'll be seeing you,   
      
   - "We don't need no education..."   
   - Yes, you do. You've just used a double negative!   
      
   http://craphound.com/walh/audiobook/download-audiobook   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca