home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,592 of 20,898   
   Akira Norimaki to All   
   Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain thi   
   16 Nov 11 07:50:22   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: diotonante@gmail.com   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?   
      
   Duggy wrote:   
   [Star Trek XI]   
   >>>> Agreed, on both. It's a funny ride but the plot is rather pointless.   
   >>   
   >>> So it's an action film.   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, pretty much. An action movie in space.   
   >    
   > It sells.   
      
   I can understand why. It would have been nice to have something more for   
   this franchise but that's what we have now. For someone is better than   
   nothing for others was better nothing. I'm somewhere in between those   
   two position, personally. I started to enjoy the movie only after I   
   realized it is not Star Trek. Not ST as I think it should be, I mean.   
   And to be totally honest with myself I don't see any the ST movies that   
   is exactly as I think ST should be, expect Khaaaaaaannnnnn and, maybe,   
   [slow] Motion Picture.   
      
   --    
   I'll be seeing you,   
      
   - "We don't need no education..."   
   - Yes, you do. You've just used a double negative!   
      
   http://craphound.com/walh/audiobook/download-audiobook   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca