home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,556 of 20,898   
   AMUN to All   
   Re: My biggest problem with Star Trek (2   
   05 Jan 10 15:18:33   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: antispam@sparmmstop.org   
   Subject: Re: My biggest problem with Star Trek (2009)   
      
      
      
   Wickeddoll wrote:   
   > Magnus, Robot Fighter wrote:   
   > Wickeddoll   
   >>> Magnus, Robot Fighter wrote:   
   >>>> [------]   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That much too much use of humor.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ESPECIALLY   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> (Spoilers)   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Right before the destruction of the Narada. The cavalier joking "You   
   >>>> got it" extermination of the enemy. YES the guy killed 6 billion   
   >>>> people, but that should make the vengence less of a joke, not more.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Overall though it was enjoyable fare.   
   >>> But aren't they the villains?  Haven't seen it in a while, but   
   >>> villains often make light of murder.   
   >>>   
   >>> Natalie   
   >>   
   >> Im talking about Kirk and Spock making jokes before opening fire on   
   >> the Narada while it was being pulled into the Black Hole.   
   >   
   > OK. I guess my military background makes me less sympathetic to a vessel   
   > that had the sole mission of destroying all of humanity, as well as the   
   > Vulcans.  Sure, there were probably children aboard, but like the   
   > Taliban regarding the west, they would have probably been indoctrinated   
   > to hate humans and Vulcans as well.  That certainly doesn't mean they   
   > should be eliminated, but unfortunately, their parents made the choice   
   > to support that cause (at least outwardly - as with the Taliban, I'm   
   > sure many totally disagree, but fear for their lives if they dissent).   
   >   
   > A sad fact of war is that you have to consider those in the crossfire as   
   > collateral damage, in order to defeat the true enemies.  It's not fair,   
   > it's evil, but that's the nature of war.   
   >   
   > Natalie   
      
      
      
   Don't go there.   
   The only justification for ANY war is that a few people want to profit from    
   it.   
      
   When there is no money to be made, or another way to make it, there are no    
   wars.   
      
      
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca