Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,556 of 20,898    |
|    AMUN to All    |
|    Re: My biggest problem with Star Trek (2    |
|    05 Jan 10 15:18:33    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: antispam@sparmmstop.org       Subject: Re: My biggest problem with Star Trek (2009)                            Wickeddoll wrote:       > Magnus, Robot Fighter wrote:       > Wickeddoll       >>> Magnus, Robot Fighter wrote:       >>>> [------]       >>>>       >>>> That much too much use of humor.       >>>>       >>>> ESPECIALLY       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> (Spoilers)       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> Right before the destruction of the Narada. The cavalier joking "You       >>>> got it" extermination of the enemy. YES the guy killed 6 billion       >>>> people, but that should make the vengence less of a joke, not more.       >>>>       >>>> Overall though it was enjoyable fare.       >>> But aren't they the villains? Haven't seen it in a while, but       >>> villains often make light of murder.       >>>       >>> Natalie       >>       >> Im talking about Kirk and Spock making jokes before opening fire on       >> the Narada while it was being pulled into the Black Hole.       >       > OK. I guess my military background makes me less sympathetic to a vessel       > that had the sole mission of destroying all of humanity, as well as the       > Vulcans. Sure, there were probably children aboard, but like the       > Taliban regarding the west, they would have probably been indoctrinated       > to hate humans and Vulcans as well. That certainly doesn't mean they       > should be eliminated, but unfortunately, their parents made the choice       > to support that cause (at least outwardly - as with the Taliban, I'm       > sure many totally disagree, but fear for their lives if they dissent).       >       > A sad fact of war is that you have to consider those in the crossfire as       > collateral damage, in order to defeat the true enemies. It's not fair,       > it's evil, but that's the nature of war.       >       > Natalie                            Don't go there.       The only justification for ANY war is that a few people want to profit from        it.              When there is no money to be made, or another way to make it, there are no        wars.                            --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp        * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (1:2320/105.97)       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca