From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
   Subject: Re: Audiences hate the new Enterprise   
      
   In article ,   
    "Fozzi"  wrote:   
      
   > "Anim8rFSK"  wrote in message    
   > news:ANIM8Rfsk-0FADCC.14112711112009@news.dc1.easynews.com...   
   > > In article ,   
   > > "Mac Breck"  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Fozzi wrote:   
   > >> > "Mac Breck"  wrote in message   
   > >> > news:T9CdnT29fL24xazUnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@supernews.com...   
   > >> >> Default User wrote:   
   > >> >>> It's also been my experience that people who don't trim are vacuous   
   > >> >>> know-nothings.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> ...or merely *LAZY* about this particular aspect of usenet   
   > >> >> housekeeping.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> --   
   > >> >   
   > >> > or dont really care about the opinions of pompous, preachy newcomers   
   > >> > like DU to a group they have been members of for thirty odd years,   
   > >> > while peachy is fairly new anim has a pretty strong claim to being   
   > >> > TOS groups longest continously serving member he's certainly among   
   > >> > the top two or three in that regard.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Cheers   
   > >> > Fozzi   
   > >>   
   > >> WTF???  What is the parent title for this thread?  I didn't write any of   
   > >> the quoted material, and the above post is the only one I have in rast   
   > >> for "Re: Audiences hate the new Enterprise" .   
   > >   
   > > I only have this and the Fozzi quote above.  I have *no* idea what this   
   > > is all about.   
   > >   
   >    
   > It was about the people whinging about peachy and you haveing a bit of a fun    
   > playful flirting game, that lasted all of about three posts, and them    
   > whinging about the two of you not post snipping, the people whinging were    
   > mostly newbies from the TOS group point of view whereas you are one of the    
   > longest serving regulars, while we havent always completely gotten along i'm    
   > not going to stand by while they attempt to bash you up over such a minor    
   > triviality like that.   
   >    
   > Incidentally Anim, in part to bring this back to thread, in part because I    
   > am genuinely curious to discuss your perspective on certain elements. If and    
   > when you do get around to watching the new movie I would like to discuss it    
   > with you, I personally think this movie was crap and Im not a particularly a    
   > JJ Abrams fan, however I am not prepared to go as far as some others in    
   > saying it has no redeemable features and no elements that are promising for    
   > their later efforts. Mind you there is one scene which will probably have    
   > you so upset you'll be hunting Abrams and Orci down so there may not be    
   > further movies regardless of success    
      
   Got it.  I added the $100 Trek09 set that comes with an ugly solid metal    
   model of the ship audiences hate to my Amazon wish list, so if somebody    
   really wants me to watch the movie, I will, but they'll pay dearly! :D   
      
   --    
   Stargate Universe SGU:  It puts the "U" in "SUCKS"!   
   It's the show 'Defiling Gravity' would be if DG had more regulars,   
   fewer abortions, worse writers, and no budget for lighting.   
   Remember, you can't spell "disgust" without SGU!   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy! (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)