Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,243 of 20,898    |
|    Wickeddoll to All    |
|    Re: Shatner sick of Star Trek feuds    |
|    02 Dec 09 17:35:02    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: not@chance.dude       Subject: Re: Shatner sick of Star Trek feuds              Anim8rFSK wrote:       >>>>> Wickeddoll wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>> Travoltron wrote:       >>>>>>> http://blogs.chron.com/celebritybuzz/2009/11/shatner_sic       _of_star_trek_f       >>>>>>> eu       >>>>>>> d.       >>>>>>> html        >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Shatner sick of Star Trek feuds       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> William Shatner has given up trying to make peace with his "bitter"        >>>>>>> former Star Trek co-stars - insisting "nothing seems to work."       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> The 78-year-old, who shot to fame as Captain Kirk on the original       1960s        >>>>>>> show, admits his memories of the series have been marred by bitter        >>>>>>> feuds        >>>>>>> with former castmates.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Shatner admitted he was hurt after former co-star George Takei failed        >>>>>>> to        >>>>>>> invite him to his wedding to longtime partner Brad Altman last year.        >>>>>>> Meanwhile, Shatner reached a gentleman's agreement with Leonard Nimoy        >>>>>>> never to talk Trek in order to salvage their friendship.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> But the star insists most of his efforts to mend relationships have        >>>>>>> been        >>>>>>> in vain, and he's finished trying to be friends with his former        >>>>>>> colleagues.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> He tells the New York Post, "I've asked them (my co-stars) numerous        >>>>>>> times to see if I can assuage their bitterness. I don't know what       their        >>>>>>> problem is, quite frankly, so I've given up on trying to make it        >>>>>>> better.        >>>>>>> I don't like any ill-feelings, and if there was something I could do       to        >>>>>>> correct it I would. But nothing seems to work."       >>>>>> On this I totally agree with him - they're being ridiculous. If they        >>>>>> don't care for his company, fine, but STFU with the whining!       >>>>> Well, it's worse than that; by all accounts he had them all over for        >>>>> (IIRC) Thanksgiving the year before they all started publishing their        >>>>> books blasting him. He say the last time he saw Nichelle before her        >>>>> book came out was then, and she was hugging him and saying she loved        >>>>> him, and BLAM. So his company was apparently fine until the book tours        >>>>> required otherwise.       >>>>>       >>>> Nice - well, I have absolutely no intention of buying any of that trash.        >>>> I think it's libelous, and if Shat really wanted to nail them on at        >>>> least some of it, he probably could. Nimoy is the only one with any        >>>> real class. I don't remember his ever complaining, and if there were        >>>> any conflicts, I really doubt he'd try to sell them. Has he?       >>> Not that I know of. There were a lot of standard issue rumors in the        >>> press of conflict between Nimoy and The Shat during the show, same as        >>> there are when any second billed actor 'breaks out' in a show; another        >>> example would be The Man from U.N.C.L.E. But either they were never        >>> true or they got over it, since Nimoy and The Shat are BFFs.       >>>       >> Yes - what I don't get is why any of the others would think we'd want to        >> see them trash each other? For the most part, we love them all. Even        >> if I hated Shat, which I never did - just didn't care for him for a        >> while, I don't want to read someone's bitter comments about him. Leaves        >> a worm in my stomach, and makes me uncomfortable. Like what's going on        >> with Tiger Woods right now - I don't like golf, but have no feelings one        >> way or another for him. Though even if I were his fan, I wouldn't want        >> to hear about the very personal parts of his life! You can't avoid it -        >> it's all over the "legitimate" news; ditto all that other crap about        >> Lohan, etc. If a celeb I like has problems, I just want to know they're        >> having problems - no details needed, just so I can pray for him/her.        >> But you don't get that, you get every sordid detail blared in your face.        >> I love celeb mags like Us, People, and Entertainment Weekly, but I        >> swear on my sister's grave, I only like to read about their career        >> stuff, see what cool (or ghastly) clothes they're wearing. Their love        >> lives, marital problems, drug/alcohol details are their own, IMO. I DO        >> think we should know if they're sexual predators, or some equally awful        >> threat to the public, so that we can decide if we want to continue to be        >> their fans; but the normal human problems are none of our effing        >> business. However, there must be a massive audience for that shit,        >> because it's omnipresent. I guess those who revel in misery are the        >> majority. I say that's the reason reality TV is so big - they want to        >> see the participants turn on each other, ever since that filthy show        >> "Weakest Link".       >>       >> If that's what people really need to see/read, they need to discover        >> real writing/performances.       >>       >> Natalie       >        > Pretty much what you said.       >        > I am having an arguement over on alt.tv.american-idol with some numbnuts        > that's screaming that Tiger Woods is having his personal live invaded.        > He says that being arrested etc. is just the arresstee's personal        > business; I'm pointing out that that's ludicrous. Once the cops are        > involved, it's public record. Doesn't mean I want to hear about it, but        > it ain't just in the family anymore at that point.       >               Troo dat - you get busted (pun intended), you're up for grabs - it's        this other stuff that's making me hork.              Natalie       --        "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"       (David Byrne, 1997)       http://www.supernaturalusa.net       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca