Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,186 of 20,898    |
|    Wickeddoll to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?    |
|    09 Dec 09 13:57:22    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: not@chance.dude       Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?              Dimensional Traveler wrote:       > A Watcher wrote:       >> trag wrote:       "Smokie Darling (Annie)"       >>> wrote:       >>>       >>>> I agree with Ted here. The whole Soran plot was just a device       >>>> (mcguffin, if I may), the real plot was reintroducing all the       >>>> characters that most ST viewers "know", and the new interactions based       >>>> on a certain event that occurred.       >>>       >>>       >>> That's not the Kirk that I "know".       >>>       >>       >> Isn't a point of the latest movie? Changing their past changed the        >> characters we knew in the original ST. Now they can go on and make        >> new movies based on these different characters. There's no end to it.       >>       >> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who are really into ST.       >>       > If you're going to change the characters and background _that_ _much_,        > why not just write something new? It would probably be easier.       >               No doubt they were selling the brand here, but I, for one, think taking        on the challenge of re-inventing well-established characters is        enormous. I think Abrams pulled it off pretty well. The film is in no        way perfect, but then (IMO, at least) only *one* of the old Trek films        was perfect: TWOK.              As I've said many times, I love the old stuff, and feel nobody will ever        re-create its magic. But that's not what the film is trying to do -        it's another interpretation of the Trek universe; nothing more, nothing        less. Much like (but much better than) fanfic, as well as the published        Trek novels.              I know some hate ST: 2009 for various reasons, but it rankles me when        they insinuate that those of us who liked ST: 2009 are somehow disloyal        (not that I feel *you've* done that) and not "real" Trek fans.              To that, I very graciously say, who died and gave them the right to        judge *us*? And while I'm at it, they can bite me.              :-D              Natalie       --        "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"       (David Byrne, 1997)       http://www.supernaturalusa.net       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca