Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,175 of 20,898    |
|    Wickeddoll to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?    |
|    09 Dec 09 12:17:08    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: not@chance.dude       Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?              A Watcher wrote:       > Ted Nolan       >>>> trag wrote:        "Smokie Darling (Annie)"       >>>>> wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>> I agree with Ted here. The whole Soran plot was just a device       >>>>>> (mcguffin, if I may), the real plot was reintroducing all the       >>>>>> characters that most ST viewers "know", and the new interactions        >>>>>> based       >>>>>> on a certain event that occurred.       >>>>>       >>>>> That's not the Kirk that I "know".       >>>>>       >>>> Isn't a point of the latest movie? Changing their past changed the        >>>> characters we knew in the original ST. Now they can go on and make        >>>> new movies based on these different characters. There's no end to it.       >>>>       >>>> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who are really into ST.       >>>>       >>> Whoops, some typos in that post.:       >>>       >>> Isn't that a point of the movie.       >>>       >>> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who aren't really into        >>> ST.       >>       >> I was wondering if that was snark or a typo :-)       >>       >> I don't think it will confuse the casual though. They know "Kirk ==        >> Captain",       >> "Spock == Pointy ears + logical", "Bones == doctor + curmudgeon",        >> "Uhura == attractive black lady + competent",       >> "scotty == engineer + 'I canna change the laws of physics' schtick".       >>       >> All that's still there. The *non* casual viewers will complain how it's       >> all wrong once you get past the first layer, the casual viewers will get       >> what they expected.       >>       >> Ted       >        > Don't the serious ST fans always complain. :-)              YUP - always have, even for the "real" Trek.              Natalie       --        "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"       (David Byrne, 1997)       http://www.supernaturalusa.net       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca