Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,072 of 20,898    |
|    Wickeddoll to All    |
|    Re: Shatner sick of Star Trek feuds    |
|    05 Dec 09 19:16:35    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: not@chance.dude       Subject: Re: Shatner sick of Star Trek feuds              Karl Johanson wrote:       > "Wickeddoll"        >> GeneK wrote:       >>> "Brad Filippone" wrote in       >>>> Ah, but how do we know that isn't what Russian accents       >>>> sound like in the 23rd century? :)       >>> If an entire nation of people actually talked like that, they would never        >>> have been allowed to survive into the 22nd century.       >>>       >>> GeneK       >> I really hope eugenics don't happen, thanks.       >        > Some forms of eugenics happen already. Sterilization of people with extreme        > metal disabilities has happed in some areas. BC (my home province) &        > Alberta's 'Sexual Sterilization' acts weren't repealed until 1972. I don't        > know if it's still happening in any specific places around the world. Some        > people obsessed with the idea of male offspring use sex screening to allow        > them to abort female foetuses. Some forms of eugenics have huge popular        > support (including support by some very powerful religions, including        > yours), such as bans on siblings marrying, allegedly because of genetic        > concerns (even though the superstitious arguments for the ban predate        > understandings of genetics by millennia).              Yes, I've heard of that stuff, but it's not being done on a massive        level - at least not yet. I have never seen anything from Catholic        doctrine supporting any type of manipulation of reproduction, other than        no contraception or abortion. And there are very good reasons to keep        siblings from reproducing! I don't know what you've read, but        inbreeding really does cause chromosomal anomalies. Does it do that all        the time? No, but I think to risk it at all is a mistake- not for moral        reasons, (though I think it's icky) but sound medical research. Please,        if this is in error, show me where you've heard inbreeding isn't usually        detrimental?              Natalie       >        > 'Positive eugenics' was practiced in Stalinist Russia, where by 'fit' women        > weren't allowed abortions.       >        > Some Christians in Uganda (with serious help from some Christians in the US)        > are working hard to pass a eugenics law where by homosexuals will be killed        > (with a rider law that anyone who doesn't report homosexuals will be        > jailed).        > http://current.com/items/91580533_kill-the-gays-bill-rachel-maddow.htm       >        > I didn't realize that laws banning interracial marriages lasted so long in        > the US. Virginia's 'anti-miscegenation' law wasn't repealed until 1967 (a        > year before Kirk & Uhura kissed on Trek).       >        > Karl Johanson        >        >        --              --        "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"       (David Byrne, 1997)       http://www.supernaturalusa.net       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca