From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: dtravel@sonic.net   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?   
      
   Steven L. wrote:   
   > On 12/9/2009 2:27 PM, GeneK wrote:   
   >> "A Watcher"  wrote in message   
   >>> Isn't a point of the latest movie? Changing their past changed the   
   >>> characters we knew in the original ST. Now they can go on and make new   
   >>> movies based on these different characters. There's no end to it.   
   >>>   
   >>> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who are really into ST.   
   >>   
   >> It's THE point of the movie, i.e., "this is why our new Trek is different   
   >> from the old Trek but still fits into canon." But casual viewers couldn't   
   >> care less about canon, and for longtime viewers, "this is a reimagining   
   >> of Trek with a new canon" would be probably be explanation enough   
   >> for a good film and "fitting into canon" won't redeem a bad one.   
   >> GeneK   
   >    
   > This movie vindicated MY position on the future of Trek, which I had    
   > stated here before (check the Google archive):   
   >    
   > Star Trek does NOT require the original actors, nor the original sets,    
   > nor the original ship models, nor the original props.  The basic concept    
   > would work with any actors and any type of ship (as long as it was large    
   > enough to hold a varied crew).   
   >    
   Yes, the basic concept would work.  If Abrahms had known what it was or    
   used it.  Characters with these names holding the same positions is    
   _not_ the basic concept.   
      
   --    
   "Dude.  They've gone fractal."   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: Sonic.Net (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)