home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   TREK      Star Trek General Discussions      20,898 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 18,952 of 20,898   
   Steven L. to All   
   Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?   
   09 Dec 09 20:40:03   
   
   From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: sdlitvin@earthlink.net   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?   
      
   On 12/9/2009 2:27 PM, GeneK wrote:   
   > "A Watcher"  wrote in message   
   >> Isn't a point of the latest movie? Changing their past changed the   
   >> characters we knew in the original ST. Now they can go on and make new   
   >> movies based on these different characters. There's no end to it.   
   >>   
   >> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who are really into ST.   
   >   
   > It's THE point of the movie, i.e., "this is why our new Trek is different   
   > from the old Trek but still fits into canon." But casual viewers couldn't   
   > care less about canon, and for longtime viewers, "this is a reimagining   
   > of Trek with a new canon" would be probably be explanation enough   
   > for a good film and "fitting into canon" won't redeem a bad one.   
   > GeneK   
      
   This movie vindicated MY position on the future of Trek, which I had    
   stated here before (check the Google archive):   
      
   Star Trek does NOT require the original actors, nor the original sets,    
   nor the original ship models, nor the original props.  The basic concept    
   would work with any actors and any type of ship (as long as it was large    
   enough to hold a varied crew).   
      
   Critics have to deal with the passage of time:  James Doohan is gone,    
   DeForest Kelley is gone, and the other actors are quite old now--too old    
   for any more swashbuckling derring-do.  If a TOS-type series is to have    
   ANY future, it HAS to be rebooted from a new cast of actors.  Otherwise    
   the only other alternative is to let Star Trek die off once and for all.   
      
   I doubt that Abrams' critics would be happy about that.  If production    
   of the movie had fallen through for any reason, they would be the first    
   ones lamenting that "TOS is dead, too bad."   
      
      
      
   --   
   Steven L.   
      
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca