From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: not@chance.dude   
   Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?   
      
   Anim8rFSK wrote:   
   > In article <7ps0clFe5oU1@mid.individual.net>,   
   >  Greg Goss  wrote:   
   >    
   >> Merrick Baldelli  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:19:45 -0500, "Mac Breck"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Shouldn't the transporter be able to _automatically_ scan all those   
   >>>> arriving and departing?  After all, it could be linked into the ships   
   >>>> computers, which would include the medical one.   
   >>> .There has been indications in some episodes that this is in   
   >>> fact the case.  Same way as they have the ability to detect weapons   
   >>> and disable them during transport.    
   >> During the leadup to TNG appearing on TV, they listed the various   
   >> improvements in technology between the two eras.  One of the changes   
   >> was that transporters could now check for infections during transport.   
   >>   
   >> I think the writers eventually ignored this change.   
   >    
   > When did TNG employ writers?   
   >    
      
   *wiping Bartles & Jaymes margarita cooler off the monitor*   
      
   Come on, TNG was probably the best of the "baby" Treks - or maybe DS9.    
   (I haven't seen very many eps, since I was living in the sticks when it    
   aired; yes, I know it's on cable - just haven't gotten around to    
   watching it) I liked Voyager, but it was hit-and-miss - Mulgrew *always*    
   rawked, no matter how schizophrenic they wrote her character.   
      
   Natalie   
   --    
   "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"   
   (David Byrne, 1997)   
   http://www.supernaturalusa.net   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)