From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: jax@knickersjaxtrawstudios.com   
   Subject: Re: Abrams' Trek Sequel To Be Released 29 June 2012   
      
   Wickeddoll wrote:   
   > Anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >  (Your Name) wrote:   
   >  "Jaxtraw"   
   >>>>>>>>> "Akira Norimaki"   
   >>>>> Steven L. wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Paramount has announced that "Star Trek 2," the sequel to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Abrams' "Star Trek" film, will be released in theaters on   
   >>>>>>>>>>> 29 June 2012.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I've just seen the first one. The plot is really crap. "The   
   >>>>>>>>>> supernova that can destroy the galaxy" is something Ed Wood   
   >>>>>>>>>> might have write, ROTFL! The rest of the movie is average at   
   >>>>>>>>>> best. I really liked only Bones, to be honest.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I don't think this second one is gonna have my money.   
   >>>>>>>>> The first load of garbage didn't have my money.   
   >>>>>>>> Have you actually seen it?   
   >>>>>>> Oh dear, here we go. Another dipstick to add to the killfile. :-\   
   >>>>>> Yep.   
   >>>>> You killfile just for asking if you've seen the flick?  That seems   
   >>>>> really unreasonable to me.   
   >>>> I know where it's heading and I've already been around this circle   
   >>>> far too many times to bother wasting any more time with another   
   >>>> idiot like that.   
   >>> But I liked ST: 2009, and you didn't killfile me.  Wouldn't it be   
   >>> better to just say you're not willing to discuss it, than to   
   >>> killfile out-of-hand? I know you and Anim8 will never see the flick, but    
   >>> don't you think   
   >>> others may ask the same question?  Do you think that automatically   
   >>> means they're a troll?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> No.  Jaxtraw is a known troll, trolling.  He's killed for his past   
   >> history, not his current lame trolling attempt.   
   >>   
   >   
   > OK   
   >   
      
   Well, this is ridiculous. I mean, if Anybody and Anim8rFSK (the man who    
   always could have done the FX better if he was asked to, but bafflingly    
   Paramount never phone him up) want to not read my posts, that's up to them.    
   But "known troll"? Do these folks even have any idea what the term "troll"    
   means?   
      
   I've had shedloads of various debates and discussions on this ng over the    
   years with people, and then somebody who spends *every post* slagging off    
   Star Trek- and then it turns out they haven't even seen the damned movie(!)-    
   wants to call *me* a "troll"?!   
      
   I mean crikey. Anybody does nothing but slag off Trek based on his own mad    
   fantasy of what "real" Trek is. But that's not trolling?   
      
   Why am I annoyed about this? The man's a known nutter. He does the same shit    
   on the BSG group, only turning up to say how it isn't really BSG and slag it    
   off. But no, oh no, that's not trolling, is it?   
      
   But somebody who says they like the thing and wants to discuss it in a    
   positive way, that's fucking trolling, is it?   
      
   Why am I annoyed about this? I got killfiled by a known usenet loon. I am    
   now popping to check I still have a life. :)   
      
      
   Ian   
      
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: Zen Internet (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)