Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,680 of 20,898    |
|    Wickeddoll to All    |
|    Re: Abrams' Trek Sequel To Be Released 2    |
|    11 Jan 10 22:15:13    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: not@chance.dude       Subject: Re: Abrams' Trek Sequel To Be Released 29 June 2012              Anim8rFSK wrote:        (Your Name) wrote:        "Jaxtraw"       >>>>>>>> "Akira Norimaki"       >>>> Steven L. wrote:       >>>>>>>>>> Paramount has announced that "Star Trek 2," the sequel to Abrams'       >>>>>>>>>> "Star Trek" film, will be released in theaters on 29 June 2012.       >>>>>>>>> I've just seen the first one. The plot is really crap. "The       >>> supernova       >>>>>>>>> that can destroy the galaxy" is something Ed Wood might have write,       >>>>>>>>> ROTFL! The rest of the movie is average at best. I really liked only       >>>>>>>>> Bones, to be honest.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> I don't think this second one is gonna have my money.       >>>>>>>> The first load of garbage didn't have my money.       >>>>>>> Have you actually seen it?       >>>>>> Oh dear, here we go. Another dipstick to add to the killfile. :-\       >>>>> Yep.       >>>> You killfile just for asking if you've seen the flick? That seems       >>>> really unreasonable to me.       >>> I know where it's heading and I've already been around this circle far too       >>> many times to bother wasting any more time with another idiot like that.       >>>       >>>       >> But I liked ST: 2009, and you didn't killfile me. Wouldn't it be better        >> to just say you're not willing to discuss it, than to killfile out-of-hand?       >>       >> I know you and Anim8 will never see the flick, but don't you think        >> others may ask the same question? Do you think that automatically means        >> they're a troll?       >        >        > No. Jaxtraw is a known troll, trolling. He's killed for his past        > history, not his current lame trolling attempt.       >               OK              Natalie       --        "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"       (David Byrne, 1997)       http://www.supernaturalusa.net       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca