From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: your.name@isp.com
Subject: Re: Abrams' Trek Sequel To Be Released 29 June 2012
"Nightspirit1701" wrote in message
news:hicacp.2ec.1@news.evilcabal.org...
> "D. Stussy" Gave a shout out with:
>
> > "Your Name" wrote in message
> > news:your.name-1001101546110001@203-109-167-101.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz...
> >> In article , Toolpackinmama
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 1/9/2010 9:44 AM, Steven L. wrote:
> >> > > Paramount has announced that "Star Trek 2," the sequel to Abrams'
> > "Star
> >> > > Trek" film, will be released in theaters on 29 June 2012.
> >> >
> >> > That's stupendous news!
> >>
> >> Hmmm ... you seem to have made a typo. You obviously meant "stupid and
> >> ridiculous". ;-)
> >
> > Obviously, you don't believe in sarcasm. The 2009 movie was crap and
the
> > only reason it was viewed was because it followed pictures that were at
> > least half-decent. However, as we're on to what Paramount is now doing,
I
> > expect that only 10% of the people who took a chance on Star Crap (2009)
> > will try the sequel - before realizing they should get their money back.
>
> Which doesn't explaing the repeat viewing. Face it they achived what they
> set out to do and that was revive Star Trek.
They did no such thing.
What they did do was create "new Star Trek", which is a different entity
altogether. They simply didn't have the brains, balls, nor talent to
actually create a brand new franchise from scratch.
"Star Trek" as we know it died when Beavis & Butthead decided to make
"Enterprise" a non-Trek Trek show and Abrams put the final nail in the
coffin. :-(
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
* Origin: Ihug Ltd (1:2320/105.97)
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)
|
