From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: your.name@isp.com (Your Name)   
   Subject: Re: Abrams' Trek Sequel To Be Released 29 June 2012   
      
   In article ,   
   Anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   >  "Your Name"  wrote:   
   > > "Anim8rFSK"  wrote in message   
   > > news:ANIM8Rfsk-43D540.13145609012010@news.dc1.easynews.com...   
   > > > In article <1cOdnUo3W_X4C9XWnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,   
   > > >  "Steven L."  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > Paramount has announced that "Star Trek 2," the sequel to Abrams' "Star   
   > > > > Trek" film, will be released in theaters on 29 June 2012.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > That's the last weekend before the Fourth of July, which helps ticket   
   > > > > sales--if Abrams can stay on schedule.  (The schedule for his first   
   film   
   > > > > slipped by some six months.)   
   > > >   
   > > > Yeah, but I don't think that was his fault; from everything I've heard,   
   > > > the film was done by the original release date.   
   > >    
   > > No doubt it was the studio idiots trying to get Kirk and Spock to be a   
   > > female characters, the computer not to talk, ... plus another miliion more   
   > > idotic changes.  :-\   
   >    
   > Actually no.  We kept *hoping* they were fixing things, stuff Abrams had    
   > said during the shoot that he couldn't address in the script because of    
   > a writer's strike, or add The Shat, or fix that embarrassingly bad shot    
   > of the Big E sitting on the ground, but I'm told they locked the film    
   > months before they released it and just sat on it.   
      
   It would makes sense to sit on it since most of it *did* come out of his   
   backside.  ;-)   
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: Ihug Ltd (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)