From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From Address: your.name@isp.com   
   Subject: Re: Abrams' Trek Sequel To Be Released 29 June 2012   
      
      
   "Graeme"  wrote in message   
   news:18e4babc-3c1d-408c-a6dd-d200090c2d60@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Jan 12, 9:12 pm, "Steven L."  wrote:   
   > > The only canon is that which appeared in episodes.   
   >   
   > Even that isn't canon when talking discussing a reboot.  For the most   
   > part, they have no obligation to remain true to the episodes.   
      
   They do have an obligation, at the very least an obligation to not screw up   
   someone else's hard work and idea. The fact is that they're just too lazy,   
   too untalented, and simply dont give a damn to bother. They're solely   
   interested in making money, screw the fans, screw "Star Trek",  ... and far   
   too many people simply sit there and let them, because they don't rally give   
   a damn either. As long as it has "Star Trek" in the title, then it must be   
   it.   :-(   
      
      
      
   --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp   
    * Origin: Ihug Ltd (1:2320/105.97)   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)