Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    TREK    |    Star Trek General Discussions    |    20,898 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,990 of 20,898    |
|    Graeme to All    |
|    Re: The Pirates of Orion (TAS): my revie    |
|    25 Oct 11 07:09:01    |
      From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos       From Address: graemecree@aol.com       Subject: Re: The Pirates of Orion (TAS): my review              This one is a good one. I might give it 8 or 9. It easily makes my       Top 5 TAS episode list . Not only do they work a lot of story into 22       minutes, but it feels like Trek, and has things that they couldn't ot       wouldn't have afforded in the live action series worked in naturally,       like the two extra ship models, and the confrontation on the       asteroid. Kirk gets a really good mix of action-adventure and       diplomacy for such a short story.              The idea behind it was long overdue. After all those plagues that       affect everybody *except* Spock, let's do a story about a disease that       affects *only* Spock.              I believe Howard Weinstein was still a teenager when he wrote this.       Or at least very close to it. I don't remember the story of how he       got his foot in the door, but I think he just submitted a script that       they liked too much to ignore. He was buddies with David Gerrold, who       broke into Trek the same way.              One minor foible. After incorrectly pronouncing it "O'Ryan" in Journey       to Babel, they corrected it to "Oreon" for this episode. At that       point they might as well have stuck to the error and said that the       pronunciation had changed over a couple of centuries.              This is the episode more than any other that got the Orion Pirates       added as a major race in Starfleet Battles. Of course they had to       ignore the ending to the episode, because in SFB the pirates are not       only still in operation, but the Orion government is still plausibly       denying any connection with them. Maybe in the SFB Universe, this       story ended with Kirk and the Pirates completing their deal.              And that's the one minor problem I have with this episode, and with       Trek in general. Too often it confirms the viewer's thinking rather       than challenging it. Tough choices are often avoided (i.e. Operation       Annihilate, where Kirk has to kill a million people or let a plague       spread, but it's just a tease, and he doesn't really have to make that       choice at all in the end), or circumstances work out so that       unpleasant things that have to be done play out in such a way that       keeps the stars hands clean. Edith Keeler has to die, but Kirk       doesn't have to actually do it himself. Despite all their       interference, she's still crossing the street at just the right moment       for fate to do it for him. Or Kruge pretty much has to die, but to       make Kirk look less bad, he actually does offer his hand to him whe       he's dangling off the cliff. Then and only then is it okay in the       audience's mind for Kirk to kick him off. (I guess the life and death       struggle that had been going on for the last 5 minutes still wasn't       enough).              The sticky choice that is conveniently avoided in this episode is what       if the Orions, not wanting to slug it out with a Heavy Cruiser, and       knowing of Kirk's Boy-Scoutish reputation (except with women, nudge,       nudge), had gone ahead with the deal they made with him, and taken       their chances that he'd stick to it? Their backstab was only possible       at all because they conveniently happened to be orbiting unstable       asteroids at the time. Suppose they hadn't been?              Would Kirk have stuck to the deal? Well, the audience wouldn't have       respected him if he'd made the deal in good faith, saved Spock, and       then turned around and betrayed the Pirates. So, I assume he would       have. But for how long? From then on, he'd feel responsible for       every act of piracy they comitted, and for every death. They couldn't       tell that story in 22 minutes, of course, but it would make a great       season-long story arc. In the end, I suspect he'd have had to go back       on his word. And the audience would have understood, but they       wouldn't have been happy about it. But this being Trek, we don't have       to worry about things like that. The Orions go back on the deal,       which frees Kirk from having to complete his end of it, giving him the       chance to go Shatnertastic on their candy-a$$es, and bring home both       the strobolin, and their ship. They don't even self-destruct this       time, they're so in awe of his performance. It's a great episode, but       just once in a while, you'd like to see them show a successful but       messy ending, because in real life you can't avoid those every time.       --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp        * Origin: http://groups.google.com (1:2320/105.97)       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca