[continued from previous message]

The last one being able to protect him from an #384 - *IMPENDING*
*ANGRY* *MOB*.

Good work all round I would say.

Good protective community policing.

#753 as [#6, #5, #300, #2, #400, #600] = shâbath (H7673): {UMBRA: #702 %
#41 = #5} 1) to cease, desist, rest; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cease; 1a2) to
rest, desist (from labour); 1b) (Niphal) to cease; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
cause to cease, put an end to; 1c2) to exterminate, destroy; 1c3) *TO*
*CAUSE* *TO* *DESIST* *FROM*; 1c4) to remove; 1c5) to cause to fail; 1d)
(Qal) to keep or observe the sabbath;

Seems like even Dolf appreciated ("...I WILL *RID*-H7673 EVIL BEASTS OUT
OF THE LAND..." [Leviticus 26:6]) the protection he was afforded.

Another job well done thanks to God. Peace and grace."

JANI @ 0853 HOURS ON 27 APRIL 2006: "That was the point I was trying to
make. Thanks to a sensible local police force, I would have thought ..."

ATHANASIUS (COPTIC) @ 0906 HOURS ON 27 APRIL 2006: "Who were given the
heads up by a servant of God. :-)

Like I said, 'Thanks [be] to God. :-)

Peace and grace."

     #103 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 21 APRIL 2023 as [#2, #5, #40, #6,
#700] /
     #113 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 21 APRIL 2023 as [#6, #5, #40, #6,
#50, #6] /
#106 as [#5, #5, #40, #6, #700] / [#5, #40, #6, #50, #5] = hâmôwn
(H1995): {UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19} 1) (Qal) *MURMUR*, *ROAR*, *CROWD*,
*ABUNDANCE*, *TUMULT*, *SOUND*; 1a) sound, murmur, rush, roar; 1b)
tumult, confusion; 1c) crowd, multitude; 1d) great number, abundance;
1e) abundance, wealth;

PETER WOOD @ 0932 HOURS ON 27 APRIL 2006: "Thanks to them being alerted
to the situation by Athanasius.

Except for that, Mr. Boek might well have been 'lynched' by a
(justifiably) angry mob.

So we can say it was a good thing that they intervened, can't we?"

DR. KEN SMITH @ 0939 HOURS ON APRIL 2006: "Australians are pretty
easy-going, on the whole.

Only two things seem to get them really worked up:

(a) Interfering with Anzac Day;

(b) Being disturbed while watching sport on TV."

PETER WOOD @ 1019 HOURS ON 27 APRIL 2006: "I'm sure there must be more:

(a) Interfering with Anzac Day and rightly so!"

DOLF @ 0616 HOURS ON 28 APRIL 2006: "No-one from the town was there at
dawn--they were hijacking ANZAC Day for their own ends and not out of
regard for any sense of duty to the State."

ATHANASIUS (COPTIC) @ 0730 HOURS ON 1 MAY 2006: "If not in [th]is the
fruit of his #368 - *HERETICAL* SABBATARIAN AND JUDAISTIC MIXED
NON-CHRISTIAN (SLANDER NOTE: #509 - YAHAD as JEWISH / CHRISTIANS which
contends against ATHANASIUS (COPTIC)'S NIHILISTIC USURPATION and MITHRAS
SUNDAY SACREDNESS as historical revisionism) BELIEFS mixed with his
physical ailments."

THEO (ATHEIST) BEKKERS @ 0936 HRS ON 28 JUNE 2006: "A very good
description of Athanasius' involvement in this."

PETER WOOD @ 1216 HOURS ON 28 JUNE 2006: "Crap!

What religious intolerance was there in this?

This was a deliberate attempt by a gay activist to use an Anzac
celebration to further his own agenda.

Do you approve of hijacking Anzac day celebrations by those with a cause
Theo?

Dolf uses his 'religious intolerance' card anytime anyone criticises
anything he says or does--either that one or the 'constitutional rights'
one, or both.

I expect better of you Theo."

ATHANASIUS (COPTIC) @ 1226 HOURS ON 28 JUNE 2006: "Your expectations
will be dashed then Pete. Thanks btw. :-)"

THEO (ATHEIST) BEKKERS @ 1275 HOURS ON 28 JUNE 2006: "I expected better
of you the day the police called on Dolf.

I was aghast.

Is there a policeman on Bridie Island?

Oops, silly question, sorry."

DOLF ON 21 JULY 2023 FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBER: AP-23-0204 /
LOWER COURT REFERENCE: L10519861 DETERMINED ON 24 FEBRUARY 2023: "There
was not ever any *HONESTY* or *INTEGRITY* shown from the *NEWS* media to
report with fidelity these events which I’ve conveyed to you.

And 10 years later the triumphant truth of the day--Is entirely mine!

Additionally a senior journalist Richard Carleton covering this
earthquake event at the Beaconsfield mine suddenly fell down and died:

TO HIS last breath, Richard Carleton was asking controversial questions.
Minutes before his extraordinary televised death yesterday, the veteran
reporter had arrived at a press conference outside the Beaconsfield
goldmine in Tasmania's north, puffing and looking tired.

It was the afternoon of the 12th day of the painstaking rescue of Todd
Russell and Brant Webb, trapped underground after an earth tremor and
rock fall at the mine. In a report he had prepared for Channel Nine's 60
minutes - aired last night - Carleton raised the spectre that the mine
collapse was man-made.

As Carleton moved among his colleagues, one father said to his son:
"Look! It's the man from 60 Minutes." Earlier, he had signed an
autograph for a young girl, writing "have a healthy life". Most of the
assembled press wanted to know about the speed of the recovery effort.
Not Carleton. At the news conference, he said to the mine manager,
Matthew Gill: "On the 26th of October last year, not 10 metres from
where these men are now entombed, you had a 400-tonne rock fall.

"Why is it, is it the strength of the seam or the wealth of the seam,
that you continue to send men in to work in such a dangerous environment?"

Carleton then walked unsteadily in a wide circle around the media pack,
staggered into the shoulder of a producer and collapsed.

Colleagues and members of the public rushed to Carleton's side, tearing
open his shirt to start cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A wall of
blankets was held up by Carleton's media colleagues, including Tracy
Grimshaw, the host of A Current Affair, until an ambulance arrived to
take him away. The 62-year-old reporter, whose career spanned four
decades, was pronounced dead on arrival at Launceston Hospital.

Sometimes critical of the media circus that gathers around tragedies and
disasters, Carleton often found himself a part of it. At Beaconsfield,
he joined TV, radio and print journalists who descended upon the small
mining town a week ago for round-the-clock coverage of the rescue."

*** TO BE CONTINUED ***


On 7/15/25 10:48, dolf wrote:
> DOLF: "I want to now extend that consideration to the Chinese term #194
> - shì (視): TO OBSERVE; TO INSPECT and how it relates to #5 - jiù (究):
> EXAMINE and #23 - yàn (驗): EXAMINE.  As perhaps a consideration of
> investigating the actual or metaphorical parameters a relative
> occurrence rather than METEMPIRICAL / A PRIORI."
>
> COPILOT @ 0819 HRS ON 15 JULY 2025: "INTERSECTION OF shì (視), jiù (究)
> AND yàn (驗):
>
> 1. KEY TERM DEFINITIONS
>      •    shì (視): to observe; to inspect
>      •    jiù (究): to examine; to investigate deeply
>      •    yàn (驗): to test; to verify
>
> 2. shì vs. jiù/yàn: SCOPE AND DEPTH
> shì establishes the contextual parameters—when, where, and what we are
> permitted to observe. It defines the temporal and spatial boundaries of
> attention.
>
> jiù and yàn focus on the quality and rigor of inquiry. jiù probes roots
> and causes, while yàn confirms or refutes findings through systematic
> testing.
>
> 3. BOUNDARY, RESPONSIBILITY, AND MORAL MEDIATION
>      •    Boundary: shì frames the field of observation, implicitly
> setting limits on what is considered relevant.

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)