[continued from previous message]

>>>>> OBSERVER at the RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF COMMUNION
>>>>> PROTESTS OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11 JUNE 2000
>>>>> (163rd day of leap year) - SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE
>>>>> TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163 - PROVIDENCE GIVES THE
>>>>> VICTORY TO THE MAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE THE BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN
>>>>> HIM, and in accordance with being collective owners (ie. our
>>>>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relating to INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO QUEEN
>>>>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT were amortised between the respective
>>>>> property holders) of a PRIVATE STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL
>>>>> BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there
>>>>> was prepared a report dated 16 MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as
>>>>> a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit where the property
>>>>> holder (ie. typical ITALIAN MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 -
>>>>> ANTI-STATISM which is incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF
>>>>> LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of
>>>>> the road had substantial opportunity to repeatedly object to
>>>>> numerous planning permits in the knowledge of their own intentions,
>>>>> thereby causing ourselves financial distress and property loss of
>>>>> our primary #39 - RESIDENCE which was contributed to by the expense
>>>>> of legal action by impetus of their haughty cultural (JULY /
>>>>> AUGUST) self entitlement and disrespect.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE
>>>>>> MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this
>>>>>> VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY
>>>>>> DEFENCE given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-
>>>>>> STATISM". At our last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @
>>>>>> CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we
>>>>>> requested action as CLOSURE of a DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 /
>>>>>> 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION which resulted within improper
>>>>>> as false characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that,
>>>>>> despite my reasonable attempts to have those improper entries
>>>>>> amended due to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE
>>>>>> upon my AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has
>>>>>> prevailed to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most
>>>>>> recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS
>>>>>> FOR THE ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER:
>>>>>> Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING
>>>>>> ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without explanation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as
>>>>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-
>>>>>> NATIONAL CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS
>>>>>> HEARING of 5 DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful
>>>>>> misrepresentation of my two telephone calls as the basis of a
>>>>>> false report to police and perjured evidence.  The following is a
>>>>>> transcript (which may contain transcription and conceptual errors
>>>>>> due to reduced audibility) dated 11 FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from
>>>>>> tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
>>>>>> (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER
>>>>>> 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE presiding over CASE
>>>>>> NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN CASUALTY & LIFE
>>>>>> (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The proceedings
>>>>>> were conducted by telephone hook-up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
>>>>>> SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been
>>>>>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the
>>>>>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in
>>>>>> effect, what that letter raised were concerns about certain
>>>>>> conduct of Mr Boek which, as I understand it, has been the subject
>>>>>> of a report to police. The reason why the Tribunal deals with
>>>>>> these matters initially at least, unless there is some exceptional
>>>>>> circumstance that would warrant otherwise by bringing on a
>>>>>> directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if necessary,
>>>>>> receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then determine
>>>>>> how best to deal with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is
>>>>>> held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone
>>>>>> the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is
>>>>>> in fact what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell,
>>>>>> to explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the
>>>>>> respondents and, of course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr
>>>>>> Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I
>>>>>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone
>>>>>> call, advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I
>>>>>> then accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite
>>>>>> threatened by the content of those messages and I had grave
>>>>>> concerns for my safety and the safety of my family. I, that
>>>>>> morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the matter and
>>>>>> they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I not
>>>>>> present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
>>>>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about
>>>>>> that. Yes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a
>>>>>> transcript of those
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my
>>>>>> associate to take an affirmation from you because given the
>>>>>> seriousness of the matter it ought to be on evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the
>>>>>> tape
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will
>>>>>> adjust the volume.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT
>>>>>> IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF
>>>>>> YOUR PAST TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE
>>>>>> HAVING ANOTHER CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH
>>>>>> YOU FURTHER AND WE WILL ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME
>>>>>> STAGE. AT SOME STAGE YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNISE THE FACT
>>>>>> THAT YOU ARE A BLASPHEMER. YOUR RELIGIOUS CONTEXT HAS NO
>>>>>> CONTINUING VALIDITY AND SINCE I AM ABLE TO RATIONALLY PROVE THAT

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)