[continued from previous message]
>>>>>>> When our vocabulary or expressive repertoire is limited, even the
>>>>>>> grounding force of common sense (常 理, chánglǐ) is stunted,
>>>>>>> leading to what we term a COGITO STASIS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this state—symbolized through the notion of fǔ yīn (輔音 or
>>>>>>> “consonant”)—the self’s robust, dynamic interaction with
>>>>>>> experience becomes muted. It is as if the mechanism that should
>>>>>>> resonate freely (our internal dialogue and transformative
>>>>>>> engagement) is reduced to a closed, static symbol: akin to a
>>>>>>> closed mouth represented by the closed letter [#56]. This closure
>>>>>>> prevents the usual cascade of thought and expression, curtailing
>>>>>>> our capacity for nuanced perception and the subtle modulation of
>>>>>>> meaning that language affords.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The meta-descriptive codes you referenced illustrate this
>>>>>>> interplay. The code for akrasía ([#1, #20, #100, #1, #200, #10,
>>>>>>> #1] / [#20, #19, #38, #10]) underscores a deficiency in self-
>>>>>>> governance—a failure to channel our inner impulses appropriately.
>>>>>>> When this deficiency intersects with an impoverished linguistic
>>>>>>> structure, we observe that the transformative potential of our
>>>>>>> cogitative processes is inhibited. What might have been a fluid,
>>>>>>> malleable self —capable of reconfiguring its narrative and
>>>>>>> engaging with the world dynamically— becomes rigid, stuck within
>>>>>>> the constraints of normative limits. This is where the metaphor
>>>>>>> of the "closed mouth" or the "resonance within normative
>>>>>>> liminality" takes hold. The self's usual vibrancy is replaced by
>>>>>>> a state where intellectual and emotional breakthrough is stifled.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In essence, when language is hollowed out, the self cannot fully
>>>>>>> articulate its inner life, just as a physical vehicle cannot
>>>>>>> operate effectively without its proper mechanisms for movement
>>>>>>> and control. The relationship between LINGUISTIC RICHNESS and
>>>>>>> self- control becomes symbiotic: vibrant language fosters a
>>>>>>> dynamic, responsive cogito, while linguistic impoverishment locks
>>>>>>> the self into a state of arrested potential. Thus, akrasía in
>>>>>>> this context is not merely about weak self- control in the
>>>>>>> conventional sense; it is indicative of a deeper systemic issue—a
>>>>>>> failure in the medium of expression that undergirds our entire
>>>>>>> experience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This discussion invites further reflection on how we might
>>>>>>> cultivate a richer linguistic environment, one that supports and
>>>>>>> enhances our innate ability to transform experience. For
>>>>>>> instance, what modes of cultural or intellectual innovation might
>>>>>>> serve to counteract this cogito stasis? Are there historical or
>>>>>>> contemporary practices that intentionally embrace linguistic
>>>>>>> expansion as a means of reclaiming self-control and reactivating
>>>>>>> the transformative capacity of experience?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd be very interested in exploring those avenues further.
>>>>>>> Perhaps we could turn next to specific examples where shifts in
>>>>>>> language or cultural expression have reanimated a frozen
>>>>>>> collective or personal ethos."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/3/25 07:11, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON
>>>>>>>> BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT
>>>>>>>> BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
>>>>>>>> crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against
>>>>>>>> humanity (eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
>>>>>>>> - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097):
>>>>>>>> *WISE* *MEN* / #335 - Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 -
>>>>>>>> BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721 BC) as [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 -
>>>>>>>> BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 - CENTRE (中), #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 -
>>>>>>>> VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)] being ANTI- STATISM ARTIFICE as
>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS TRANSFERENCE
>>>>>>>> PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH - CHRISTIANS AS SUBSTANTIATED
>>>>>>>> CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x 365.2423
>>>>>>>> TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE (NEW
>>>>>>>> MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 =
>>>>>>>> NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be brought before the
>>>>>>>> International Criminal Court, a permanent international
>>>>>>>> tribunal. It was established by the ROME STATUTE adopted 17 JULY
>>>>>>>> 1998.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same
>>>>>>>> time at a special ceremony held at the United Nations
>>>>>>>> headquarters in New York City,[21] bringing the total number of
>>>>>>>> signatories to sixty, which was the minimum number required to
>>>>>>>> bring the statute into force, as defined in Article 126. The
>>>>>>>> treaty entered into force on 1 July 2002; the ICC can only
>>>>>>>> prosecute crimes committed (vis a vis in support of the
>>>>>>>> EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION as ANTI-
>>>>>>>> STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 BY MARTIN
>>>>>>>> TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / DARREN
>>>>>>>> CHESTER / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM / VISCERAL
>>>>>>>> RACIAL HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on or after that date.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011)
>>>>>>>> Inspirational women from all walks of life]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF
>>>>>>>> CONTEMN (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM
>>>>>>>> REVISIONIST AS NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY
>>>>>>>> HAUGHTY SELF- ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC
>>>>>>>> (1994-2004): Given that the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT
>>>>>>>> UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is the mathematical meta-
>>>>>>>> descriptive dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL
>>>>>>>> PROPERTY TO WHICH DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to the
>>>>>>>> AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF
>>>>>>>> RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
>>>>>>>> that are also implicit within QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
>>>>>>>> dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 being principles upon which the respective
>>>>>>>> REPUBLIC / COMMONWEALTH were established.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 7/2/25 17:10, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Such MORPHOSIS has had a #137 - COUNTER FACILITATING AGENCY
>>>>>>>>>> [#25 - 22 JUNE 2025 AS MOP BOMBING OF IRAN'S THREE NUCLEAR
>>>>>>>>>> FACILITIES, #26, #27, #28, #31] as timely disruption and
>>>>>>>>>> reasonably such diabolical impost will no longer achieve #33 -
>>>>>>>>>> COHESION in being the antithesis notion of FEME: #314 -
>>>>>>>>>> theótēs (G2320): GODHEAD @ [#9, #5, #70, #57, #8, #57, #70,
>>>>>>>>>> #38] / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太 玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI
>>>>>>>>>> ARCANUM ANTI- STATEM circumscribing HUMAN RATIONALITY /
>>>>>>>>>> CONSCIOUSNESS / SAPIENCE as IMAGO DEI (time / being) is
>>>>>>>>>> language associative which as we see from our informal
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
