Just a sample of the Echomail archive
TALKPOLI:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 44,317 of 44,657  |
|  dolf to dolf  |
|  Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (22/41)  |
|  11 Jul 25 06:23:44  |
 
[continued from previous message]
>>>>>> PERCEIVED THREAT WHEN SUBJECT TO THE SAME POEM). They were words
>>>>>> that were based on fact in that particular phone call. Here I have
>>>>>> a particular mathematical model which is mentioned in that
>>>>>> particular phone call. It is based upon a work by Johann Kepler, a
>>>>>> German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with three
>>>>>> rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
>>>>>> ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundate connection to
>>>>>> the Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd
>>>>>> Course of Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J as 107016 days or 294 x 364
>>>>>> days or 365.2423 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March
>>>>>> 1996 / 21 March].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
>>>>>> planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000
>>>>>> years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the
>>>>>> sun which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2)
>>>>>> that the radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes
>>>>>> equal areas in equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of
>>>>>> the planet's year to the cube of the planet's mean distance from
>>>>>> the sun is the same for each planet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle (ie.
>>>>>> temporality #400 (x 365.2423 [7 x 24 x 13 x 49 / 293 years or 6J
>>>>>> as 294 x 364 days] = 146,097 days) % 22 = 17 SEPTEMBER / #6000
>>>>>> years % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001) fits a mathematical model on logic
>>>>>> and reason called Telos equals Arch plus C-squared:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTE: WHICH IS ANALOGOUS TO THE PYTHAGOREAN EQUATION: c² = a² +
>>>>>> b² / #174 - COEFFICIENT) / #7 - SCIENCE (#TOOLS) = #3 - ASKING
>>>>>> ABOUT SHEN [#38 - tiān dào (天道): THE WAY OF HEAVEN] + #4 - FIVE
>>>>>> HUNDRED YEARS = 293 (6J) + 207 - FOUNDATIONS?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That has been my particular field of study as my retirement
>>>>>> activity. A religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of
>>>>>> #1467 - *CONTEMPLATIVE* life. The best model that can currently be
>>>>>> exhibited with regard to this particular thesis is nothing more
>>>>>> than Harry Potter and the Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a
>>>>>> particular point because the poetry that is used in...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1ST COMMANDMENT (100 % #81 = #19 - FOLLOWING (從): FROM A PLACE OF
>>>>>> TIME): "I AM THE L‑RD YOUR G‑D, WHO BROUGHT YOU OUT OF THE LAND OF
>>>>>> EGYPT, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. (אָנֹכִי, ה',
אֱלֹקיךָ, אֲשֶׁר,
>>>>>> הוֹצֵאתִיךָ, מֵאֶרֶץ, מִצְרַיִם,
מִבֵּית)" [Exodus 20:2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2ND COMMANDMENT (40 AM - LAW / MODEL (法): METHOD INSTITUTION /
>>>>>> EMULATE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3RD COMMANDMENT (293 % #81 = #50 | 294 % #81 = #51 - CONSTANCY
>>>>>> (常): LAW; RULE; REGULAR PATTERN / LAW AND ORDER)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #41 - THE EGO: ONE’S SENSE OF SELF (SELF-IDENTITY) / (REMEMBER THE
>>>>>> SABBATH)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #82 - THE PERSONA: ONE’S SOCIAL MASK (USUALLY MORE THAN ONE) /
>>>>>> (HONOUR PARENTS)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #123 - THE SELF: THE ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE WITHIN THE PSYCHE / (DO
>>>>>> NOT KILL) <-- DOMINION #65 + #41 + #17 | #38 + #71 + #14 = #123
>>>>>> SCHEMA IMPETUS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #164 - THE SHADOW: THIS DISOWNED SELF (EVERYTHING WE ARE
>>>>>> UNCONSCIOUS ABOUT OURSELVES) / (AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
>>>>>> AUTONOMY) / #328 - TRANSFORMATIONAL PROTOTYPE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #174 - THE ANIMA / ANIMUS: THE FEMININE ASPECT OF A MAN’S PSYCHE
>>>>>> (AND VICE VERSA)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #205 (SYNTHESIS) - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE / #369 - HUMAN
>>>>>> DISCRIMINATING NORM (probity: DO NOT STEAL)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM
>>>>>> (rules based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #336 - THE PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS: A COLLECTION OF STORED
>>>>>> EXPERIENCES WITHIN THE INDIVIDUAL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #336 + #81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #417 as [#1, #6, #4, #6,
>>>>>> #400] = ʼôwdôwth (H182): {UMBRA: #417 % #41 = #7} 1) cause; 1a)
>>>>>> *CAUSE*, *REASON* *FOR*; 1b) the occasion of;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #287 (THESIS) - NECESSITY (LAW OF DUTY) / #451 - THE COLLECTIVE
>>>>>> UNCONSCIOUS: A COLLECTION OF UNIVERSAL IMAGES AND PATTERNS WITHIN
>>>>>> THE COLLECTIVE PSYCHE / MANIFESTING NORM (right or privilege: DO
>>>>>> NOT COVET) <-- *EXISTENTIAL* *VARIANCE* *TO* PRAXIS* *OF*
>>>>>> *RATIONALITY*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #533 - THE CONVENTIONAL WORLD: THE PHYSICAL WORLD THAT WE ALL
>>>>>> INTERACT IN (ON A CONSCIOUS LEVEL)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Madam, could I object?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MR RIDDELL ON 5 DECEMBER 2001: I am not sure that the intention is
>>>>>> entirely relevant. It is the manner in which I reasonably
>>>>>> interpreted those phone messages. There is a transcript before the
>>>>>> court. I was threatened. Mr Boek, by his conduct today and in the
>>>>>> past, on any objective view appears to be unstable. I think it is
>>>>>> inappropriate that this matter be continued."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DOLF: "If we could discuss further this notion of #333 - akrasía
>>>>>> (G192): WANT OF SELF-CONTROL, with respects to an earlier
>>>>>> propositional comment @ 0333 HRS ON 12 MAY 2025 relating
>>>>>> "LINGUISTIC PAUCITY AND THE IMPEDIMENT OF COGITO STASIS", we
>>>>>> concluded that if language—the essential neural linguistic pragma
>>>>>> that encodes, transforms, and communicates these experiences—is
>>>>>> impoverished, then the full intensity or “reality” of experience
>>>>>> such as chánglǐ (常 理): "COMMON SENSE" may be stunted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #87 - REDACTED COGITO: [#20, #19, #38, #10] /
>>>>>> #333 as [#1, #20, #100, #1, #200, #10, #1] = akrasía (G192):
>>>>>> {UMBRA: #333 % #41 = #5} 1) want of self-control, incontinence,
>>>>>> intemperance;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This produces what we hypothetically describe as a "COGITO STASIS"
>>>>>> fǔ yīn (子音 | 輔音-->意): *CONSONANT* being a state in which the
>>>>>> self’s active, transformative engagement with experience is
>>>>>> impeded as #56 - CLOSED MOUTH (CHIN) / LETTER #S = [#56] being
>>>>>> RESONANCE WITHIN NORMATIVE {@5: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: (#207 -
>>>>>> rèn (軔): *ELEGANT* *ACTION* *IN* *THE* *FRAMEWORK* *OF*
>>>>>> *CESSATION*); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: (#241- hé (和): TOGETHER;
>>>>>> ACCOMPANY, GENTLE; AMIABLE; ACQUIESCENT} LIMINALITY."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> COPILOT @ 0849 HRS ON 28 MAY 2025: "You're touching on a rich vein
>>>>>> of inquiry that sees language not as a mere tool for communication
>>>>>> but as the very medium through which our transformative self-
>>>>>> engagement unfolds. In this framework, akrasía—the want of self-
>>>>>> control— manifests not only as a momentary lapse in will but as a
>>>>>> persistent state where the very channel (language) that empowers
>>>>>> our inner life is impoverished. Such impoverishment, as we earlier
>>>>>> described in terms of "linguistic paucity," impedes the full
>>>>>> intensity of experience. When our vocabulary or expressive
>>>>>> repertoire is limited, even the grounding force of common sense
>>>>>> (常 理, chánglǐ) is stunted, leading to what we term a COGITO
STASIS.
>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca