XPost: alt.france, nl.politiek, alt.islam
XPost: uk.legal
From: dolfboek@hotmail.com

CORRECTION:

Subsequent to that determined PROTEST ACTION of 21 AUGUST 1999 as
occurring betwixt the EVENTS in being a #509 - yâhad (H3054): *JEWISH* /
MALE: #511 / FEME: #267 - NazÅ
raîos (G3480): *CHRISTIAN* OBSERVER at the
RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF COMMUNION PROTESTS OF BOER WAR
MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11 JUNE 2000 (163rd day of leap year) -
SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS
IDEA #163 - PROVIDENCE GIVES THE VICTORY TO THE MAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE
THE BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN HIM, and in accordance with being collective
owners (ie. our INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relating to INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT were amortised between the respective
property holders) of a PRIVATE STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there was
prepared a report dated 16 MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit where the property holder (ie.
typical ITALIAN MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM which
is incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR
GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of the road had substantial
opportunity to repeatedly object to numerous planning permits in the
knowledge of their own intentions, thereby causing ourselves financial
distress and property loss of our primary #39 - RESIDENCE which was
contributed to by the expense of legal action by impetus of their
haughty cultural (JULY / AUGUST) self entitlement and disrespect.


On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:
> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE
> MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this VCAT
> REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE given
> the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM". At our
> last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @ CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL
> GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we requested action as CLOSURE of a
> DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION
> which resulted within improper as false characterisation within POLICE
> COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite my reasonable attempts to have those
> improper entries amended due to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE
> CONSEQUENCE upon my AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has
> prevailed to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most
> recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE
> ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER: Q11839982 of 30
> AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024,
> without explanation.
>
> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as CHIEF
> LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-NATIONAL
> CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS HEARING of 5
> DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my
> two telephone calls as the basis of a false report to police and
> perjured evidence.  The following is a transcript (which may contain
> transcription and conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11
> FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL &
> ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of
> 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE
> presiding over CASE NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN
> CASUALTY & LIFE (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The
> proceedings were conducted by telephone hook-up.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>
> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>
> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
> SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
> on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
> Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
> raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
> understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
> why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
> there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
> necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
> determine how best to deal with it.
>
> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
> if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
> Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
> what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
> what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
> course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
> finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>
> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I received a
> telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
> he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
> on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
> messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
> family. I, that morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
> matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
>
> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
> of those
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>
> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
> to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
> matter it ought to be on evidence.
>
> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
>
> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
> volume.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>
> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.
>
> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT IF
> YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF YOUR PAST
> TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE HAVING ANOTHER
> CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH YOU FURTHER AND WE WILL
> ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME STAGE. AT SOME STAGE YOU ARE

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)