XPost: alt.france, nl.politiek, alt.islam
XPost: uk.legal
From: dolfboek@hotmail.com
Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE
MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this VCAT
REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE given
the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM". At our
last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @ CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL
GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we requested action as CLOSURE of a
DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION
which resulted within improper as false characterisation within POLICE
COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite my reasonable attempts to have those
improper entries amended due to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE
CONSEQUENCE upon my AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has
prevailed to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most
recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE
ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER: Q11839982 of 30
AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024,
without explanation.
That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as CHIEF
LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-NATIONAL
CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS HEARING of 5
DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my
two telephone calls as the basis of a false report to police and
perjured evidence. The following is a transcript (which may contain
transcription and conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11
FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL &
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of
0936 hours 5 DECEMBER 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE
presiding over CASE NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN
CASUALTY & LIFE (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The
proceedings were conducted by telephone hook-up.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.
In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I received a
telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
family. I, that morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
presenting myself by way of telephone today.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those
THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.
MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.
TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT IF
YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF YOUR PAST
TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE HAVING ANOTHER
CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH YOU FURTHER AND WE WILL
ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME STAGE. AT SOME STAGE YOU ARE
GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNISE THE FACT THAT YOU ARE A BLASPHEMER. YOUR
RELIGIOUS CONTEXT HAS NO CONTINUING VALIDITY AND SINCE I AM ABLE TO
RATIONALLY PROVE THAT WITH A MATHEMATICAL MODEL..... YOU ARE GOING TO
UNDERSTAND HOW FORCEFUL AND HARD METAPHYSICS IS."
MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.
The purpose of our pre-CONSULTATION NOTE conveyed to the MEDICAL
SPECIALIST dated 8 JULY 2025, was to proffer current advice on our
writing a submission within VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXXX / 2025 as a LIFE
CONTEXT STATEMENT which encompasses that PROTEST EVENT ON 21 / 25 AUGUST
1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION and over which there is exuded a certain
self-assuredness and satisfaction expressed within the content of
TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO made to CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE INSURER on 30
NOVEMBER 2001 as then causal for the EXTRA-ORDINARY VCAT DIRECTIONS
HEARING dated 5 DECEMBER 2001 conveying their misrepresentation as
impetus for a strikeout of the matter, as then related matters we had
sought closure over involving other organisational misrepresentation of
our totally reasonable, premeditated as determined actions with respects
to the devising a strategy to ensure survival of our INSURANCE MATTER of
now some 30 years duration.
Firstly with respects to substantiating the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL
#1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM", we provided our MEDICAL SPECIALIST with
an informal research opinion dated 7 JULY 2025 on such precedent of
action with regards to "EXAMINING CAPTAIN COOK'S SECRET COMMAND 30 JULY
1768 THROUGH THE LENS OF KANT'S CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON 1781 / 1787 |
PROLEGOMENA 1783 / 1787 WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE A COSMOLOGICAL RATIONALE."
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
