Just a sample of the Echomail archive
TALK2893:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 22,049 of 22,188  |
|  David Dalton to David Dalton  |
|  Re: sexual edits  |
|  22 Feb 23 17:55:58  |
 XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.agnosticism XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy From: dalton@nfld.com On Feb 22, 2023, David Dalton wrote (in article<0001HW.29A5F5850032906470000225738F@88.198.57.247>): > As of 0300 UTC February 22, 2023, homo sapiens globally has > split, in terms of sexual compatibility and tendency to associate > (DNA adjustments will come later), into 55 equal human species. > As part of this, some abusive romantic relationships have > been split across species boundaries. The remaining > abusive romantic relationships have been made optimally > sexually compatible (see below). > > As of 0623 UTC February 22, 2023, > the sexual harmonics of 22% of humans have been adjusted > for better (usually optimal) sexual compatibility. This has > affected 57% of committed relationships. The remaining > 43% can be broken up into 22% who were already optimally > sexually compatible, 14% who were and remain partially > sexually compatible, and 7% who have been broken up > (all of whom who were incompatible and/or were in > abusive relationships, though some abusive relationships > were made optimally sexually compatible). Of course > I am pulling these numbers out of my... perineum. :-) Some incompatible relationships were made optimally sexually compatible. But in the case of platonic gay--lesbian parenting relationships not including at least one a.s.r. which have lasted at least the last 15 years without a breakup of more than a week and/or have resulted in at least one child (of the two) under 16, including adoptive or fetus, if each has at least one same sex partner then they have become bim--bif, which is partially compatible (less than optimally compatible and less likely to stick). Also there is one more case of breakup. If a partially compatible or incompatible relationship including at least one a.s.r. (assisted shaktipat recipient) has not lasted at least the last five years without a breakup of more than a week and neither partner is a parent of at least one child under 16, including adoptive or fetus, there was no adjustment, and they are broken up, since a.s.r. no longer have partial compatibility. This seems to apply to Joe and Jill Biden, and I have suggested new matches for them on the “various matches” thread on alt.religion.druid . But what about the platonic gay--lesbian example above, where each has at least one same sex partner, say another gay and another lesbian, but with at least one partner an a.s.r., and meeting the 5 years and/or child under 16 criteria? They can’t become bim--bif as above since they the a..s.r. no longer have partial compatibility. So in this example the 2gays+2lesbians would have become bim-+bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F or straight-type-2-M+bifT+bif+bif who are all optimally compatible in both cases. My Eight Sexual Harmonics matchmaking theory is described on a subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns webpage. Note that optimal compatibility leads to longer lifespans than partial compatibility which in turn leads to longer lifespans (especially for the deceived, if any) than incompatibility. (There is no longer one-way attraction, so there should no longer be any deception.) -- David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) "I gave my love a golden feather/I gave my love a heart of stone/and when you find a golden feather/it means you'll never lose your way back home." (R.R.) --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca