XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic
XPost: alt.christnet
From: me@nothere.biz

On 03-October-2014 8:26 AM, mur@.not. wrote:

> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:28:14 +0100, grabber  wrote:
> ..
>> On 29/09/2014 02:28, felix_unger wrote:
>>
>>> I'm happy to discuss any topic of mutual interest, but there has to be
>>> agreement on the basics first. we can't proceed to discuss 'B' unless we
>>> first agree about 'A' .
>> Wrong. You don't have to use the word evidence at all.
>>
>> Allow me to translate:
>>
>> I think when Malte says
>>
>> "there is no evidence for god, or Nessie, or Dogheads"
>>
>> he probably means something like
>>
>> "there is no verifiable material that gives adequate grounds for belief
>> in god, or Nessie, or Dogheads"
>>
>> I am sure that Malte could adjust this wording if it's not quite right.
>      If God does exist at least some of the evidence of his existence is
false
> evidence. If God does not exist then ALL evidence is false evidence. By
claiming
> there's no evidence the moron is saying that there's no false evidence, even
> though every bit of it might be false and it's pretty much certain that
there's
> some false evidence. So that narrow, shallow and from my pov horribly
dishonest
> position could not be much more incorrect.

well said!


--
rgds,

Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -
Barack Obama

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)