XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.sceptic
From: me@nothere.biz

On 27-June-2014 6:58 AM, mur@.not. wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:04:15 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:
> ..
>> In article <0v4jq9pegu8jsja3ohufh7hb9s9hlmga5n@4ax.com>, mur@.not.
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:24:04 -0500, Free Lunch 
wrote:
>>> .
>>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:26:15 -0400, PATRICK 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:34:55 -0500, Free Lunch 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:17:27 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:02:22 -0230, David Dalton 
wrote:
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> In article <19bmp9hme2n7tg15gvfe17n76r9t4bnfj1@4ax.com>, mur@.not.
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:27:57 -0230, David Dalton 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article , mur@.not.
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:56:34 -0230, David Dalton 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.  mystic "live" sparks as opposed to dead normal static ones
>>>>>>>>>>>      Where?
>>>>>>>>>> The first one was in the center of my inner right forearm.
>>>>>>>>>> I was barefoot at the time and the air wasn't very dry and
>>>>>>>>>> I was standing in the middle of the room well away from
>>>>>>>>>> any metal.
>>>>>>>>>      How long did it last and what did it do?
>>>>>>>> It didn't last long, maybe half a second, and it zapped
>>>>>>>> me, but I didn't see any light.   Also it felt more
>>>>>>>> alive, like a hummingbird, than a usual static zap.
>>>>>>>     Well if a deity had something to do with it then there doesn't seem
>>>>>>>     like
>>>>>>> there's much point in trying to pretend otherwise.
>>>>>> Why do you pretend that there are deities when there is no reason to
>>>>>> accept such a silly claim?
>>>>> Why do you deny the existence of something you can't understand?
>>>> I tentatively deny the existence of everything that is posited without
>>>> any supporting evidence
>>>      AGAIN I present you with a basic challenge that has so far completely
>>> defeated every one of you atheists so entirely that none of you have yet
been
>>> able to attempt to address it:
>>>
>>> If God does exist WHAT type of evidence do atheists think there "should
be"?
>>> WHERE do atheists think the evidence they beg for "should be"? WHY do
>>> atheists
>>> think it "should be" to God's benefit for him to provide us with whatever
>>> particular evidence they keep whining about?
>> I think that God, or gods, like diversity, and hence are not
>> providing evidence for any one viewpoint.
>      It's clear that they provide enough evidence to persuade billions of
people
> of their existence, if they or He or whatever do/does exist.

I caught the tail end of a conversation at a party last weekend. this
chap was saying that scientists are unable to explain why cells 'know'
what their 'place' is in the human body. ie. why one cell 'knows' it's a
brain cell and another a kidney cell, etc.,

--
rgds,

Pete
-------
election results explained: http://ausnet.info/pics/labor_wins2.jpg
“People sleep peacefully in their beds only because rough
men stand ready to do violence on their behalf”

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)