XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic
XPost: alt.christnet
From: olrik666@yahoo.com

Le 2014-06-24 11:05, mur@.not. a écrit :
>      For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence" of
> God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to try
to
> explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't even
> address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed evidence
> "should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it
"should
> be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at all
what
> they think they think, or even what they want other people to think they
think
> they think. It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire group of
> atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions, nor can they
as a
> group figure out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is it sad?
> Because it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were trying
to
> talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.

It looks like you're asking us to provide you with an excuse *not* to
believe in «god».

--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)