XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic
XPost: alt.christnet
From: catpainmerca@gmail.com

On 24/06/2014 16:05, mur@.not. wrote:
> For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence"
>  of The Great Wallaby of Frink's existence? For quite a while, we
> know that. Yet when challenged to try to explain WHAT sort of
> evidence they think "should be" where, they can't even address the
> challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed evidence
> "should be" they again are helpless.
(with laughter)
> When challenged to explain WHY it "should be" to Great Wallaby of
> Frink's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at all
>  what they think they think, or even what they want other people to
> think they think they think.
You think so?
> It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire group of
> atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions,
(not our job)
> nor can they as a group figure out what they think they're trying to
> talk about. Why is it sad? Because it would be interesting to learn
> what they thought they were trying to talk about IF they had any
> idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.
We've seen you don't O Molecule Mind.  Hence our skepticism.

Hey it's your ficticious creation, you can assign it all the attributes
you want.  If some of those are testable, then so much the better.

Catpain Merca

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)