f0dd11aa
XPost: uk.philosophy.humanism, alt.society.conservatism, alt.society.liberalism
From: mlwi@swipnet.se

"Peter Brooks"  skrev i meddelandet
news:9dd0c453-f776-48be-9068-9bfba91f8259@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 10, 5:29 pm, "M Winther"  wrote:
>
>>
>> Keywords: ethnic IQ, crime statistics, the Other, multicultural
>> complex, unconscious racism, eugenics, Arabic reversal, mass
>> immigration
>>
>Yea, but, as Lance pointed out, on another thread, it's just a matter
>of degree. An Afghani beggar with schizophrenia and a serious head
>wound is only different from Wittgenstein in a mere matter of degree.
>Fix the wound, the schizophrenia, the language and a few other minor
>matters and you'd expect the Tractatus from every beggar.

Sub-Saharan African IQs average 71-75. Historically, Arab slave trade
imported between 11 to 25 million sub-Saharan black Africans, and from
thousands to in excess of one million Europeans (Wikipedia). The
female slaves were exploited sexually (Arab men viewed the womb only
as the room their seed grew in). The African genome was swallowed up
by the Arab population.

The mixing of the two races that occurred rapidly during medieval
times could explain the mysterious cultural reversal that took place
in the Arab world. The Arabic population had at a point inherited so
much of sub-Saharan African traits that it affected the vitality of a
whole civilization. Today's arab mean IQ is around 83, but 86 for the
Lebanese.

In nature, the animals instinctually fear outbreeding, i.e. that the
offspring should lose characteristics suitable for the environment, by
the introduction of foreign genes. That's why species never
interbreed. Nor will a chaffinch from southern Sweden mate with a
chaffinch male from northern Sweden. The female will detect that his
song is different and reject him.

In the human habitat, however, people don't seem to fear that their
children should lose their indigenous intelligence when marrying
ethnicities with a significantly lower average IQ, who are also
significantly different with respect to ambition and hard work, etc.
Thereby thousands of years of genetic investments is thrown away. In
Sweden the unemployment rate of the biggest immigrant group, the
Somalis, is at least 80%. The state of the market doesn't affect this
figure significantly. They continue to breed children and to build a
life entirely upon the welfare system. These people are clearly
different than the Swedish ethnic group.

People swing between the opposites. Not long ago overblown Aryan
ideals dominated, but now people can cohabit with any lowlife, and are
completely unconscious of differences. How about taking a sane middle
position, and to stop swinging between the opposites? A naive
unconsciousness only paves the way for a comeback of Nazi ideals.
Society becomes polarized. It is really very very sad what is
happening. Great Britain once outshined the rest of the nations, now
it is in debt and can hardly fend for itself. Will it experience a
cultural reversal like the Arab nations did in the Middle Ages? Will
the Brits also adopt inane beliefs, regress in every respect, and
become a backward people?

In traditional cultures people felt a responsibility to carry on the
ways of their forefathers. It primitive societies it is sometimes
called ancestor cult. Our ancestors built our culture, its mores and
conceptions, they also gave us our valuable genetic advantages,
expecting that we should continue to build on this. Today, people have
no awareness  that they have a responsibility to preserve what their
ancestors have built. We squander our heritage, allow alien values and
cultures to take root, dilute our gene pool, which is suitable for our
Western culture. It is morally very very saddening. The ancestor
spirits are heartbroken.

Mats

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)