XPost: talk.atheism, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian
From: vigyazat@hotmail.co.uk

From Christopher A.Lee :

> Yet another lying theist rationalising the negative reaction to theist
> bullshit, slander, imposition etc as "hate" and "enger".

That would be 'anger'.  Little wound up while typing, maybe?

And yeah, it's relevant.  You rationalise your anger and your hatred based
on your conviction that you're righteous and just - which is exactly how
religious fanatics justify theirs.  The problem is the same: it's just the
excuse that's different.  Slander's evil when theists do it; it's an
acceptable means to an end when atheists do it.  Imposition is evil when
it's "you must believe": but when it's "you must not believe", that's just
peachy.

A militant is still a militant, whether religious or not.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)