Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNC_SYSOPS    |    Synchronet Multinode BBS Software Suppor    |    33,243 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 33,067 of 33,243    |
|    Rob Swindell to GitLab note in main/sbbs    |
|    Option to pack SMB backups    |
|    20 Jan 26 16:33:17    |
      TZUTC: -0800       MSGID: 59219.sync_sys@1:103/705 2dd63c20       PID: Synchronet 3.21b-Linux master/177a369d2 Jan 04 2026 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.34-Linux master/f6746e937 Jan 19 2026 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: VERT       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/issues/993#note_8149              The mail base is normally self-packed, so packing doesn't usually save much in       terms of disk space. That said, running a daily event that executed "smbutil       -a p %zmail.0.shd" should do pack the most recent backup of the mail base.              The reference to the empty mail.sdt file seems unrelated to packing. Maybe you       want us to not bother backing up an empty mail base? That sounds like an easy       feature to implement.       --- SBBSecho 3.34-Linux        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 103/13 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757       SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 240/1120       SEEN-BY: 240/5832 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125       SEEN-BY: 301/1 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58       SEEN-BY: 460/256 1124 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 8912 5054/30       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 103/705 280/464 460/58 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca