TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 14816.dove-sync_sys@723:320/1 2d90e7d1   
   REPLY: 723:1/1 692797af   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.32-Linux master/ec8f7009f Nov 15 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   > While I think vi(m) is a great editor for programming, I think nano is /much/   
   > better suited for this hobby specifically, as far as writing and replying to   
   > text messages goes. Then again, I prefer nano over vi(m) any time, so that's   
   > probably a pretty biased opinion. ;)   
      
   I have monkeyed around with vi(m) a time or two and, as a result, I am also   
   very biased towards nano.  ;)   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Do unto others BEFORE they do unto YOU.   
   ---   
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 13/0 102/401 103/1 13 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 128/187 129/14 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 700 705 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426