TZUTC: -0800   
   MSGID: 58935.sync_sys@1:103/705 2d8dc397   
   REPLY: 723:1/1 692797af   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/efc0fbb26 Nov 09 2025 GCC 13.3.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.32-Linux master/ec8f7009f Nov 15 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: DIGDIST   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: SlyEdit 1.92e (2025-11-11) (ICE style)   
     Re: SlyEdit   
     By: Accession to Mike Powell on Wed Nov 26 2025 05:59 pm   
      
    Ac> While I think vi(m) is a great editor for programming, I think nano is   
    Ac> /much/ better suited for this hobby specifically, as far as writing and   
    Ac> replying to text messages goes. Then again, I prefer nano over vi(m) any   
    Ac> time, so that's probably a pretty biased opinion. ;)   
      
   When I'm on Linux, I do like vim for programming (I got used to it at one of   
   the jobs I had), though I don't think vi or vim would be suitable as a message   
   editor.  I feel like it's a "right tool for the job" type of thing.   
      
   That said, lately I've used vim less for programming on Linux these days, in   
   favor of things like Visual Studio Code & such.  However if I'm not using a   
   GUI (just a text terminal), then I'll use vim out of habit.   
      
   Nightfox   
      
   ---   
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 13/0 102/401 103/1 13 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 128/187 129/14 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 700 705 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426