TZUTC: -0800   
   MSGID: 55438.sync@1:103/705 2dac1c25   
   REPLY: 55431.sync@1:103/705 2dac0928   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/6b4a1dc45 Dec 19 2025 MSC 1944   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Linux master/114c3dfde Dec 19 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: VERT   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
     Re: pros and cons   
     By: Morningstarr to Digital Man on Fri Dec 19 2025 05:23 pm   
      
    > Which bbs software is more feature rich?   
      
   I think that's too subjective of a question for me to answer.  If Synchronet   
   has more features, but you (or you users) don't care about or use those   
   features, you wouldn't care.   
      
    > What type of Internet-integrations can synchronet do that the   
    > other two can't?   
      
   Here's a complete list of Synchronet's included TCP/IP servers/services:   
   https://wiki.synchro.net/faq:tcpip#ports   
      
   Which ones exactly are or or are not supported by the other two, I don't know   
   off the top of my head.   
      
   I don't think either Major BBS or Wildcat support SSH, for example. For a   
   complete detailed comparison, you'll probably want to do a little more   
   research yourself.   
   --    
                                               digital man (rob)   
      
   This Is Spinal Tap quote #24:   
   David St. Hubbins: You're a haughty one, saucy Jack.   
   Norco, CA WX: 61.9øF, 72.0% humidity, 0 mph N wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.33-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187   
   SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 700 840 860 880 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426