Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNCHRONET    |    Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum    |    43,341 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,815 of 43,341    |
|    Fernweh to Gamgee    |
|    Re: Silly question - QWK download    |
|    05 Dec 25 17:07:57    |
      TZUTC: -0800       MSGID: 55359.sync@1:103/705 2d99902c       REPLY: 55352.sync@1:103/705 2d98fe40       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/15881ca0d Dec 02 2025 MSC 1944       TID: SBBSecho 3.32-Linux master/060f885b0 Dec 02 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: VERT       CHRS: UTF-8 4       FORMAT: flowed       > No, you're doing it because you're ignorant. I'm trying to help you get       > past that.              > Wrong. Again because of ignorance. Have you ever heard of an echomail       > "Offline Reader"? Apparently not, or you'd not > have made that statement       > above. Many folks, including me, use that method of reading/replying to       > messages.              > You're on a roll, wrong again. That is an entirely different issue,        > which I sort of agree with you on. Correct quoting methods are indeed       > important, including removing irrelevant parts.        > Fully agree with that.               Well, there's a small win. I'll take it.              > But that doesn't mean you don't quote at all.              > ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.              So this is how you reply? You belittle and misread the very thing you asked       about - context. I clearly stated it was for snark and humor and you took it to       a personal level. Not cool in the least and it goes (IMHO) against the very       thing that BBSing used to be good at; Community.              The "thanks guys" needed zero context as it was a general reply to all who were       helpful in the thread. If you're reading ALL New Messages, I can see how you       would lose context, but that's not a me issue, that's threading not used on       your end. *If* you genuinely were concerned with the topic, you could've simply       moved into the correct group and followed along. Instead you decided to flame.       I'll take the high road here and continue on in a constructive manner.       --- SBBSecho 3.32-Linux        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 7715       SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 240/1120 5832       SEEN-BY: 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31       SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58       SEEN-BY: 460/256 1124 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 8912 5054/30       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 103/705 280/464 460/58 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca