home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   SYNCHRONET      Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum      43,341 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 42,719 of 43,341   
   Carlos Navarro to All   
   Re: NNTP and To: field   
   09 Nov 25 13:51:53   
   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   MSGID: 4727.fdint_synchronet@2:341/200 2d75d6e1   
   REPLY: 723:1/1 690d26bd   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/be4b8fe97 oct 21 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.30-Linux master/be4b8fe97 oct 21 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: ZRUSPAS   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: Mozilla Thunderbird   
   06/11/2025 23:40, Accession (1:103/705):   
      
   >  >> I think what he was saying, is that even when there /is/ a recipient   
   >  >> (doesn't just about every 'reply' message have a recipient?), it   
   >  >> still uses "All" (and I don't disagree that is indeed how NNTP has   
   >  >> always worked).   
   >    
   >  > No, not all USENET replies have a recipient.   
   > Correct, however /this/ (as in what I'm fairly certain we're discussing)    
   > isn't USENET. We're using NNTP to access our message bases (which may or    
   > may not actually carry USENET). I think this conversation was much more    
   > pointing towards BBS/FTN messages. Most local and FTN messages    
   > (particularly replies) on a BBS usually have a recipient (do they not?),    
   > unless it's specifically sent to "All".   
   >    
   >  > X-Comment-to is not a requirement or universally used.   
   >    
   > You're right. However, in the hobby we are involved in, it makes the    
   > normal "To" and "From" fields look like everyone elses that aren't using    
   > NNTP. I also wasn't stating that Synchronet needed to do that, I was    
   > just mentioning that's how I got around all of my messages posted with a    
   > newsreader being addressed to "All".   
   >    
   > What (I think?) the question from the OP was, was asking why /all/    
   > messages are addressed to "All" when it seems like there's something    
   > already in the code that is looking for a recipient it could be filling    
   > the "To" field with on a reply?   
      
   Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks, Nick.   
      
   This is a reply to a message from Accession in the SYNCHRONET echomail    
   area, sent via Thunderbird on the NNTP server of a Synchronet-based BBS.   
   The message will likely be posted to the echo with recipient "To: All"    
   instead of "To: Accession"   
      
   Carlos   
   --- SBBSecho 3.30-Linux   
    * Origin: Zruspa's BBS - bbs.zruspas.org (2:341/200)   
   SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 7715   
   SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 240/1120 5832 263/1   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 200 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/267   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 384 410 414 418 420 422 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26   
   SEEN-BY: 5019/40 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 341/200 66 280/464 633/280 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca