Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNCHRONET    |    Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum    |    43,341 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,719 of 43,341    |
|    Carlos Navarro to All    |
|    Re: NNTP and To: field    |
|    09 Nov 25 13:51:53    |
      TZUTC: 0100       MSGID: 4727.fdint_synchronet@2:341/200 2d75d6e1       REPLY: 723:1/1 690d26bd       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/be4b8fe97 oct 21 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.30-Linux master/be4b8fe97 oct 21 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: ZRUSPAS       CHRS: UTF-8 4       FORMAT: flowed       NOTE: Mozilla Thunderbird       06/11/2025 23:40, Accession (1:103/705):              > >> I think what he was saying, is that even when there /is/ a recipient       > >> (doesn't just about every 'reply' message have a recipient?), it       > >> still uses "All" (and I don't disagree that is indeed how NNTP has       > >> always worked).       >        > > No, not all USENET replies have a recipient.       > Correct, however /this/ (as in what I'm fairly certain we're discussing)        > isn't USENET. We're using NNTP to access our message bases (which may or        > may not actually carry USENET). I think this conversation was much more        > pointing towards BBS/FTN messages. Most local and FTN messages        > (particularly replies) on a BBS usually have a recipient (do they not?),        > unless it's specifically sent to "All".       >        > > X-Comment-to is not a requirement or universally used.       >        > You're right. However, in the hobby we are involved in, it makes the        > normal "To" and "From" fields look like everyone elses that aren't using        > NNTP. I also wasn't stating that Synchronet needed to do that, I was        > just mentioning that's how I got around all of my messages posted with a        > newsreader being addressed to "All".       >        > What (I think?) the question from the OP was, was asking why /all/        > messages are addressed to "All" when it seems like there's something        > already in the code that is looking for a recipient it could be filling        > the "To" field with on a reply?              Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks, Nick.              This is a reply to a message from Accession in the SYNCHRONET echomail        area, sent via Thunderbird on the NNTP server of a Synchronet-based BBS.       The message will likely be posted to the echo with recipient "To: All"        instead of "To: Accession"              Carlos       --- SBBSecho 3.30-Linux        * Origin: Zruspa's BBS - bbs.zruspas.org (2:341/200)       SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 7715       SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 240/1120 5832 263/1       SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219       SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 200 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/267       SEEN-BY: 633/280 384 410 414 418 420 422 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26       SEEN-BY: 5019/40 5020/400 5075/35       PATH: 341/200 66 280/464 633/280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca