Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNCHRONET    |    Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum    |    43,341 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,682 of 43,341    |
|    Accession to Digital Man    |
|    NNTP and To: field    |
|    06 Nov 25 16:40:46    |
      TZUTC: -0600       MSGID: 723:1/1 690d26bd       REPLY: 55210.sync@1:103/705 2d720f7f       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02       BBSID: PHARCYDE       CHRS: UTF-8 4       FORMAT: flowed       Hey Digital!              On Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:03:00 -0800, you wrote:               >> I think what he was saying, is that even when there /is/ a recipient        >> (doesn't just about every 'reply' message have a recipient?), it        >> still uses "All" (and I don't disagree that is indeed how NNTP has        >> always worked).               > No, not all USENET replies have a recipient.               Correct, however /this/ (as in what I'm fairly certain we're discussing) isn't       USENET. We're using NNTP to access our message bases (which may or may not       actually carry USENET). I think this conversation was much more pointing       towards BBS/FTN messages. Most local and FTN messages (particularly replies)       on a BBS usually have a recipient (do they not?), unless it's specifically       sent to "All".               > X-Comment-to is not a requirement or universally used.              You're right. However, in the hobby we are involved in, it makes the normal       "To" and "From" fields look like everyone elses that aren't using NNTP. I also       wasn't stating that Synchronet needed to do that, I was just mentioning that's       how I got around all of my messages posted with a newsreader being addressed       to "All".              What (I think?) the question from the OP was, was asking why /all/ messages       are addressed to "All" when it seems like there's something already in the       code that is looking for a recipient it could be filling the "To" field with       on a reply?              Regards,       Nick              ... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.       --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409        # Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/1)        ■ Synchronet ■ _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187       SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 840 860 880       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705       SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35       PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca