Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNCHRONET    |    Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum    |    43,341 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,674 of 43,341    |
|    Digital Man to Accession    |
|    NNTP and To: field    |
|    05 Nov 25 18:03:01    |
      TZUTC: -0800       MSGID: 55210.sync@1:103/705 2d720f7f       REPLY: 723:1/1 690bdb10       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0       COLS: 80       BBSID: VERT       CHRS: CP437 2       FORMAT: flowed       NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105        Re: NNTP and To: field        By: Accession to Digital Man on Wed Nov 05 2025 05:08 pm               > Hey Digital!        >        > On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:01:02 -0800, you wrote:        >        > >> Replies in echomail areas through Synchronet's NNTP server include        > >> "All" in the To: field. I had assumed this was standard behavior for        > >> SBBS, similar to the old NNTP-FTN gateways. (However, the REPLY        > >> kludge appears to be functioning correctly, allowing messages to be        > >> properly threaded.)        > >>        > >> After reviewing the source code of nntpservice.js, I discovered a        > >> function named getReferenceTo. If I'm not mistaken, this function        > >> should return the recipient's name, but it defaults to "All" when a        > >> recipient isn't found.        > >>        > >> Could it be that this function isn't working as intended?        >        > > If a recipient isn't found, "All" seems like a sensible default. Are you        > > saying the failure to find a recipient is a bug? Feel free to play with        > > it and offer up a patch if you have one.        >        > I think what he was saying, is that even when there /is/ a recipient        > (doesn't just about every 'reply' message have a recipient?), it still uses        > "All" (and I don't disagree that is indeed how NNTP has always worked).              No, not all USENET replies have a recipient. X-Comment-to is not a requirement       or universally used.       --         digital man (rob)              Synchronet "Real Fact" #31:       The Synchronet IRC server (ircd) was written in JS by Randy Sommerfeld (Cyan)       Norco, CA WX: 61.1øF, 72.0% humidity, 5 mph WNW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs       --- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187       SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 840 860 880       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705       SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35       PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca