home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   SYNCHRONET      Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum      43,341 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 42,674 of 43,341   
   Digital Man to Accession   
   NNTP and To: field   
   05 Nov 25 18:03:01   
   
   TZUTC: -0800   
   MSGID: 55210.sync@1:103/705 2d720f7f   
   REPLY: 723:1/1 690bdb10   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: VERT   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
     Re: NNTP and To: field   
     By: Accession to Digital Man on Wed Nov 05 2025 05:08 pm   
      
    > Hey Digital!   
    >   
    > On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:01:02 -0800, you wrote:   
    >   
    >  >> Replies in echomail areas through Synchronet's NNTP server include   
    >  >> "All" in the To: field. I had assumed this was standard behavior for   
    >  >> SBBS, similar to the old NNTP-FTN gateways. (However, the REPLY   
    >  >> kludge appears to be functioning correctly, allowing messages to be   
    >  >> properly threaded.)   
    >  >>   
    >  >> After reviewing the source code of nntpservice.js, I discovered a   
    >  >> function named getReferenceTo. If I'm not mistaken, this function   
    >  >> should return the recipient's name, but it defaults to "All" when a   
    >  >> recipient isn't found.   
    >  >>   
    >  >> Could it be that this function isn't working as intended?   
    >   
    >  > If a recipient isn't found, "All" seems like a sensible default. Are you   
    >  > saying the failure to find a recipient is a bug? Feel free to play with   
    >  > it and offer up a patch if you have one.   
    >   
    > I think what he was saying, is that even when there /is/ a recipient   
    > (doesn't just about every 'reply' message have a recipient?), it still uses   
    > "All" (and I don't disagree that is indeed how NNTP has always worked).   
      
   No, not all USENET replies have a recipient. X-Comment-to is not a requirement   
   or universally used.   
   --    
                                               digital man (rob)   
      
   Synchronet "Real Fact" #31:   
   The Synchronet IRC server (ircd) was written in JS by Randy Sommerfeld (Cyan)   
   Norco, CA WX: 61.1øF, 72.0% humidity, 5 mph WNW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187   
   SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 840 860 880   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca