Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNCHRONET    |    Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum    |    43,341 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,488 of 43,341    |
|    deon to Accession    |
|    sbbsecho and bad packets    |
|    08 Oct 25 13:39:31    |
      TZUTC: 1100       MSGID: 51956.dove-syncdisc@12:1/2 2d4bcfd7       REPLY: 723:1/1 68e5a492       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/b7d3db6c3 Sep 28 2025 GCC 10.2.1       TID: SBBSecho 3.30-Linux master/88b423313 Sep 29 2025 GCC 12.2.0       COLS: 80       BBSID: ALTERANT       CHRS: CP437 2       FORMAT: flowed       NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105        Re: sbbsecho and bad packets        By: Accession to deon on Tue Oct 07 2025 06:36 pm              Howdy,               > For the record, I run hpt/binkd as my main hub and my BBS is Synchronet.        > Both have exchanged mail many times per day for many years. I have no issue        > here with hpt and Synchronet whatsoever.              Yeah, I used to as well, and had no issues.              Where I think the issue stems from (which I'm guessing based on these packets)       - is that the areas are PASSTHRU.              I've seent hpt happily pass through bad mystic packets, and this might be       another example of that. I havent looked deep enough to work it out.               > Is is possible said node is using a very old version of hpt, if that is even        > the tosser they're using?              I dont think so, they switched to hpt in the last couple of years, but who       knows |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca