home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   SYNCHRONET      Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum      43,341 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 41,509 of 43,341   
   Carpetgunk to Digital Man   
   Telnet confusion   
   08 Apr 25 15:32:53   
   
   TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 53979.sync@1:103/705 2c5bacf0   
   REPLY: 53975.sync@1:103/705 2c5b9633   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/7b42b9be2 Apr 08 2025 MSC 1942   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.24-Linux master/ad9ab307f Mar 18 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: VERT   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
     Re: Telnet confusion   
     By: Digital Man to Carpetgunk on Tue Apr 08 2025 01:55 pm   
      
   Hey Rob! Thanks for the replies!   
      
    >  > Hey all--working on setting up sbbs for the first time in moons. I'm   
    >  > having trouble enabling SSL telnet at the SBBS config level.   
    >   
    > Synchronet doesn't support SSL telnet. What gave you the impression that it   
    > did?   
      
   Ha! I don't know. It's been a few decades since I was a SysOp or a user. I   
   wrongly assumed it was a standard.   
      
    >   
    >  > I can't seem to find   
    >  > notes, documents, or mention of explicitly enabling it   
    >   
    > It's not supported.   
      
   Yep, got it.   
      
    >   
    >  >, and manually trying   
    >  > to modify sbbs.ini or services.ini using telgate   
    >   
    > Why would use telgate to modify those files? That makes no sense.   
      
   I thought that was the telnet service. I'm on the same page now :)   
      
    >  > And more broadly, I   
    >  > don't know if I want/need to enable Telnet SSL, RLogin, SSH, and/or the   
    >  > web side of things.   
    >   
    > No, you don't need "the web side of things" at all for the terminal server   
    > operations.   
      
   I worded this poorly. I was wondering if I need to [should] enable any   
   particular type of connection method, terminal and/or web, to accommodate   
   users of today. Are most folks connecting certain ways more than others? I   
   guess I could get around to enabling all methods, but I'm still curious how   
   most folks use BBS nowadays.   
      
   Thanks again!   
   --- SBBSecho 3.24-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 153/757 7715 154/10   
   SEEN-BY: 154/30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 317 400 426 428 470 550 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 5054/30 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 280/464 460/58 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca