Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    SYNCHRONET    |    Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum    |    43,341 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41,509 of 43,341    |
|    Carpetgunk to Digital Man    |
|    Telnet confusion    |
|    08 Apr 25 15:32:53    |
      TZUTC: -0700       MSGID: 53979.sync@1:103/705 2c5bacf0       REPLY: 53975.sync@1:103/705 2c5b9633       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/7b42b9be2 Apr 08 2025 MSC 1942       TID: SBBSecho 3.24-Linux master/ad9ab307f Mar 18 2025 GCC 12.2.0       COLS: 80       BBSID: VERT       CHRS: ASCII 1       NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105        Re: Telnet confusion        By: Digital Man to Carpetgunk on Tue Apr 08 2025 01:55 pm              Hey Rob! Thanks for the replies!               > > Hey all--working on setting up sbbs for the first time in moons. I'm        > > having trouble enabling SSL telnet at the SBBS config level.        >        > Synchronet doesn't support SSL telnet. What gave you the impression that it        > did?              Ha! I don't know. It's been a few decades since I was a SysOp or a user. I       wrongly assumed it was a standard.               >        > > I can't seem to find        > > notes, documents, or mention of explicitly enabling it        >        > It's not supported.              Yep, got it.               >        > >, and manually trying        > > to modify sbbs.ini or services.ini using telgate        >        > Why would use telgate to modify those files? That makes no sense.              I thought that was the telnet service. I'm on the same page now :)               > > And more broadly, I        > > don't know if I want/need to enable Telnet SSL, RLogin, SSH, and/or the        > > web side of things.        >        > No, you don't need "the web side of things" at all for the terminal server        > operations.              I worded this poorly. I was wondering if I need to [should] enable any       particular type of connection method, terminal and/or web, to accommodate       users of today. Are most folks connecting certain ways more than others? I       guess I could get around to enabling all methods, but I'm still curious how       most folks use BBS nowadays.              Thanks again!       --- SBBSecho 3.24-Linux        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 153/757 7715 154/10       SEEN-BY: 154/30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 114       SEEN-BY: 229/206 317 400 426 428 470 550 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512       SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757       SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888       SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 5054/30 5075/35       PATH: 103/705 280/464 460/58 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca